Boston Herald: Pawlenty VP

http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_3_7.gif

CNBC says it’s Palin

ABC says its Palin
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5684098&page=1

But ABC also says she is still in Alaska, and will not be coming to Ohio
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/08/mccain-vp-conte.html

CNN says it’s Palin

CNN is right…for once;-)

About time:shock:

Never trust the Boston Herald anyway…:wink: :smiley: :smiley:

A heckuva lot better looking than Biden …

McCain’s Website Confirms Palin. (talk about a bold move… wow).
http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/News/PressReleases/Read.aspx?guid=b1a33b7f-5388-4ab9-99a4-95d9d35268ce

McCain just sealed the deal for the presidential election…unfortunately for Hussein rather than himself though :roll: .

I think this just shows what an idiot McCain really is. While I don’t like Romney, he would or at least could have helped McCain get elected. Personally I think that seals the deal, Obama is the next president. The Republicans came up with a geezer who is likely to die in office, and a know-nothing housewife to take his place? Well at least that sews up Alaska wonder what his plans are for the other 49 states. :mrgreen:

18 months ago Hillary and Rudy looked like they had it all wrapped up, and look what we got. Who would have thunk? :roll:

Do you like Obama’s gun views?

No, do you think the president has any control over the 2nd Amendment? How about Roe Vs Wade?

These issues are only talking points & wishful thinking on the part of a candidate seeking votes. If Constitutional matters could be dictated from the Oval Office they would have been reformed long ago during the Reagan Administration.

Listening to McCain introduce Palin. I’m excited. This woman has grit and her resume makes Obama’s look like a absolute joke.
Obama made a huge error in ignring Hillary. He will live to regret it.

Palin for pres.:slight_smile:

Except that the next president will have three or four supreme court nominees. If Obama gets in and has a democrat senate, he will appoint justices in the ilk of Ginsberg, and the second amendment could be overturned.

This has always been the argument of the left, that conservative presidents can appoint more conservative justices and overturn Roe v Wade.

The message to the DNC from the GOP right now is …

http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/10/10_6_4.gif

Biden who?

Ouch! She evokes the theme of Change and stirs up a crowd. Obama who?
http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/10/10_2_12.gif

Blaine…can you give even 1 example of the Supreme Court ever overturning an Amendment to the Constitution? just 1. Talk about puffery. Amendments can only be overturned by another Amendment. ie. 18th overturned by the 21st. (Prohibition)

Roe v Wade was merely a court ruling, which could be overturned by a court of a different persuasion.

It’s not about the second amendment being overturned. That would require 2/3 of the states to agree and only after a repeal amendment was passed.

It’s about activist judges “interpreting” want the amendment means.

Liberals have been trying to change the meaning of the amendments and the constitution by appointing Supreme court justices who do not believe in original intent and or the plain meaning of the words used.

I double dog dare any liberal to claim otherwise.

I changed the word Blaine, to the way I see it. Hope you don’t mind me borrowing your sentence.