Bush Budget Cuts Lead Poisoning Prevention Funds

Originally Posted By: gromicko
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



(April 14, 2004) – The White House’s proposed budget for fiscal 2005 would take away $35 million from the nation’s lead poisoning prevention program–which absorbs the cost of professional home evaluations and repairs in an effort to protect children from exposure to dust, soil, or paint particles containing toxic lead.


Crumbling paint in older properties is the leading culprit in lead exposure; and affected young people can experience developmental, behavioral, and psychiatric problems as a result. Advocacy organizations warn that the 20-percent funding reduction in HUD's prevention program--from $174 million this year to $139 million--could prevent as many as 40,000 U.S. homes from reaching lead-safe status in 2005.

HUD's David E. Jacobs, however, reports that the administration remains committed to solving the childhood lead poisoning problem. Cases of lead poisoning among children under age 6 has declined from more than 890,000 a decade ago to 434,000 as of 2000, he notes; and the number of homes nationwide containing lead paint dropped from 64 million to 38 million between 1990 and 2000.

To offset the reduced funding next year, Jacobs says his agency will ask real estate companies, banks, foundations, and other private-sector interests to step up their financial involvement in lead remediation.

Source: Washington Post (04/11/04); Goldstein, Avram


Originally Posted By: dosborn
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



Wouldn’t that be better titled…


"The War on Terrorism forces Budget Cuts in Lead Poisoning Prevention Funds" ????


Originally Posted By: Blaine Wiley
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



Quote:
HUD's David E. Jacobs, however, reports that the administration remains committed to solving the childhood lead poisoning problem. Cases of lead poisoning among children under age 6 has declined from more than 890,000 a decade ago to 434,000 as of 2000, he notes; and the number of homes nationwide containing lead paint dropped from 64 million to 38 million between 1990 and 2000.


It seems to make sense that if the number of lead poisonings has reduced by half, the number of homes with lead paint had dropped by 26 million, and we stopped lead paint in 1978 that we can afford a cut in funds of 20% in this area.

Now if we could just apply this to a whole bunch of other depts. in the government.....