Sorry to others - but we are experiencing serious thread drift here. But (Roy) since you feel that I evade your questions…
Offers have been communicated to Nick, and the NCA would welcome an Equivalency Review by the independant management consultants of NACHI and/or the CMI.
FYI: Others associations are stepping up to the plate. So good for them in seeing the opportunities that others choose not to recognize. Perhaps it has benefits in several provinces where other home inspectors and associations as well as training providers outside of Canada that are aligned to recognize those benefits in our future vision.
It’s simply a matter of choice, apply or not! As much as you may wish that the NC will fail, it is moving forward, like it or not. For anyone to speculate that NACHI or CMI or CAHPI or OAHI is better or not is just a small groups attempt to undermine any goodwill that some have tried to build in bridging differences. It will always be doomed to fail unless some people are smart enough to realize the commonalties we share, rather than pecking away at negative details that are best solved internally within those associations.
You say you could care less - but who keeps raising the issue of OAHI and CAHPI time and time again? So I say give it a break - not just for me - but for all the others that have experienced you regurgitated messages over and over again. The witch hunt is over - yes, there may be skeltons in the closet - yes, we get it!
As such - I am an optimist - not a pessimist! I look forward to a fair playing field for one and all, providing we are playing by the same rules of the game. At least some people are moving forward to invoke changes.