# covered entrys for wind mits ????

**URL:** <https://forum.nachi.org/t/covered-entrys-for-wind-mits/58938>\
**Category:** Florida and SUNachi Inspectors\
**Created:** [May 1, 2011, 4:00pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/covered-entrys-for-wind-mits/58938 "2011-05-01T16:00:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![khunt](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/khunt/32/89347_2.png) [@khunt](https://forum.nachi.org/u/khunt)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2011, 8:08pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/covered-entrys-for-wind-mits/58938/21 "2011-05-02T20:08:12Z")

</div>

> [@jshishilla](#):
>
> MSFH is on the old form and the old standard

BUT has the OIR ever come out and explicitly said to stop using these methodologies, or supplied a guideline on what to do now? Or are most just following Yorks stuff as the new standard?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rthurman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8e7dd6/32.png) [@rthurman](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rthurman)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2011, 9:01pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/covered-entrys-for-wind-mits/58938/22 "2011-05-02T21:01:14Z")

</div>

> [@khunt](#):
>
> BUT has the OIR ever come out and explicitly said to stop using these methodologies, or supplied a guideline on what to do now? Or are most just following Yorks stuff as the new standard?

Sure they did, it is called the Uniform Mitigation Inspection Form, Version OIR-B1-!802(Rev.02/10) Adopted by rule 690-170.0155.

The wording on the options for determining roof geomerty is completely different on the new form from that which was present on the old form. The “50% of the wall on which its sets” standard or threshold was removed from the new form and is therefore no longer uesd to determine roof geometry, for about a year now. The old method for determining roof was replaced with a new method for determining roof geometry on the current form and Bill York’s “STUFF” is explaning roof the geometry options on the new form not setting a standard. The new form went through public workshops and meetings and was adopted by the Florida Cabinet and went into effect last year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jshishilla](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/jshishilla/32/1188_2.png) [@jshishilla](https://forum.nachi.org/u/jshishilla)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2011, 10:35pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/covered-entrys-for-wind-mits/58938/23 "2011-05-02T22:35:56Z")

</div>

The instructors updated their classes also. Many insurance companies will not take the form unless you have taken a class since the new form came out.

[Previous page](https://forum.nachi.org/t/covered-entrys-for-wind-mits/58938.md?page=1)
