It seems the humor has some taints of truth also… in this regard.
One of the primary goals of CMI (as Nick has stated) is to promote
a way for educational vendors to promote achievement and thus
help supply income to those vendors. I see this as OK, since
more education is not going to hurt the inspection industry.
Money moves things and it is not evil in itself. We are all here
for profit and desire to succeed.
But one of the problems with CMI has been the vocal complaints
from SOME that CMI needs even higher qualification in order
to make it more creditable. The low numbers of the present
CMI numbers appear to show that not much is happening.
If you assume this idea, then it’s easy to start from this premise
and talk about CMI as needing changes.
As Michael is finding out, some of those who want to make it
more restrictive are indeed going to make it less successful
in helping the education vendors have a market to sell to.
If the present CMI standards restrict the market share of
potential inspectors to approx. 5%… then making the CMI
standards twice has hard may indeed doom the educational
potential altogether.
Since Michael stated that a “business plan” must be put in
place for CMI… this rude reality has come into his focus by now.
The CMI naysayers who want to make it harder, do not
have a track record of building market innovations like Nick.
Nick has already factored into the present CMI standards
a balance between marketability and creditability.
Perhaps the problem is not the current CMI standards, but
the marketing of CMI to the naysaysers entrenched resentments
of NACHI and its founder, Nick (the guy some love to hate).
Perhaps the problem is marketing and not qualifications.
If marketing to 5% of the inspector industry seems slow,
perhaps it’s part of the tiny turf to begin with. Why make
it any smaller?
And… this tiny 5% is an experienced inspector community
that has lost its novice fantasy about being an inspector.
When marketing to the huge market base of newbie dreamers,
it looks easy. CMI is a different sell altogether.
IMHO.