OK, so we have all heard of the poorly performed re-inspections and where the primary inspector has re-documented the existance of mitigating features.
How about Re-inspections where discrepencies are listed that just aren’t true.
I saw the first results of a property that I inspected that had a re-inspection - The ID report stated discrepencies such as FBC equivalent roof and Roof Deck attachments.
My original report indicated that the roof did not meet the FBC - (installed in 1992) and that the roof deck attachments were (A) - (In this case - staples)
It just burned me up that the inspector indicated on his report that I miss reported these items - That is just tarnishing my reputation as an inspector!!
Has anyone else run across this???