InterNACHI Addresses Kansas HI Board Abuses of Authority

The following letter was sent on Tuesday to the Governor of Kansas with copies to various Kansas newspapers.

Those of you who are dealing with local electronic media outlets in your areas are free to copy and send this to the reporters you are working with.

Please join me and thanking Nick for his support and Mark for his expertise.

Good letter, thanks Nick and Mark!

The wordsmith is at it again. I hope the governor grants their request for time to discuss the issues.

There are two active CMI’s in Kansas; me and Dan Bowers. Between the two of us, our phone has not been ringing at all. Due to the new Kansas laws, RE agents, insurance agents, engineers are all exempt from the laws. If you do one or two “system checks”, those persons are also exempt. I believe that the contractors, roofers, plumbers, etc. are all doing system checks for free. I know for a fact that a real estate company in Missouri are doing radon testing in Kansas cheaply, and for “discounts”. Apparently, all of the KCRAR, MAR, Luke Bell, and any other agent and their associations now could care less about home inspectors.

The Governor and the lawmakers feel the same; all they care about is the next election. I am voting for the one who is NOT in office, no matter what.

Great Letter

Lets us now if you get a response.

Gary the RE office you speak is that Reality Executives in LS,MO

Yep. An “independent” RE office in Overland Park is doing home condition evaluations for free, since one of their agents is a former contractor. I do radon checks, but have used the Air-Chek kits for years without an issue. I have heard some concerns for RE agents doing radon tests with electronic equipment; you can program electronics to do and say anything; I heard they only charge about $75.

In Columbia, MO there is a Realtor that owns his own environmental company. He does not know his butt from a hole in the ground when it comes to mold. He even does mold remediation and performs his own clearance testing. Realtors love him. For some reason he never finds anything wrong with a moldy house. He charges half of what I do. Sad but true.

Radon Testing -

I’ve done radon testing since 1992. I’ve used cannisters and electronic monitors for tests. I’ve set 2 different brands of electronic monitors up in my own house ALONG with different brands of cannisters on several occassions to check them for accuracy against each other.

On any time I’ve tested like this I’ve never had a spread of more than 0.7 of a spread between the group. Therefore I’m comfortable with the ability of both types of tests to produce accurate results.

HOWEVER, the cannisters can be cheated on easier than the electronics.

Posted on Sat, Nov. 28, 2009
Some home inspectors say new Kansas law doesn’t pass the test


The Star’s Topeka correspondent


For years, anybody with a stepladder and a flashlight could work as a home inspector in Kansas.

There were no state licenses for inspectors and no state agency to complain to if inspectors failed in their job.

But a new law imposing regulations on Kansas home inspectors has set off a firestorm in the industry. Some inspectors argue that the law will drive good inspectors out of business, hurting the very public the law intends to help.

“I’m worried about my business right now,” said Gary Farnsworth, an Olathe inspector who has deluged lawmakers with requests to reconsider the law. “I don’t want somebody running my business. This gives the (regulatory) board absolute power to control the industry.”

Under the law, inspectors must register with the state and abide by professional standards derived from national inspector associations. They must be trained and meet continuing education requirements. The law also requires inspectors to have insurance and caps liability for inspectors who are sued at $10,000.

Of particular concern to Farnsworth is a provision that allows the licensing board to examine the work records and reports of inspectors under investigation.

Lawmakers who pushed for the new law argue that homebuyers deserve to have protection from inspector negligence. They said most inspectors already abide by the new standards voluntarily. And they note that real estate agents, architects, appraisers and mortgage brokers already are regulated.

“It’s a basic consumer protection,” said Rep. Steve Brunk, a Bel Aire Republican and one of the prime advocates of the legislation. “We felt there needed to be some minimal standards.”

But Farnsworth and some other inspectors are fighting the new rules.

They accuse the man charged with implementing them of abusing his position for personal gain.

Jeff Barnes, a Wichita home inspector, serves as the chairman of the state’s fledgling Home Inspector Registration Board. Barnes said he got involved to ensure whatever regulations the state adopted were fair to inspectors and the public.

Barnes registered himself before any other inspectors and claimed the first registration as his own. His professional Web site proudly declares him to be “Kansas’s 1st Registered Inspector.”

And the registration board’s official address is Barnes’ own address.
All this has raised some eyebrows.

“He’s using his clout to help his own business,” Farnsworth said.

But Barnes said he gave himself the first registration because he was testing the system before registering other inspectors.

“This is a whole new agency,” Barnes said. “We had to test out the process.”
Barnes said that because of budget woes, the state can’t afford an office for the board yet, so he had to use his own address.

But the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors was so concerned about Barnes that its lawyers wrote to Gov. Mark Parkinson, asking him to investigate. A spokeswoman for Parkinson said he would take the request under advisement.

Farnsworth also questions why the new rules are even needed. He thinks real estate agents wanted to shield themselves from liability, so they pressured lawmakers to make home inspectors liable for up to $10,000 for mistakes.

Previously, inspectors could limit their liability to the cost of the inspection.

Brunk, the main advocate of the new law, is a real estate broker.

But Brunk said that the law won’t help his business and that nothing in it prohibits homebuyers from suing anyone — inspectors or agents — if they feel cheated.

If anything, he said, the new law’s cap on inspector liability shields inspectors from potentially devastating lawsuits.
To reach David Klepper, call 785-354-1388 or send e-mail to