Apparently posted by an ‘industry leader’ on another ‘private’ message board and forwarded to me by a mole;
I’m beginning (finally) to believe that the general public is as dumb as a bag of hammers.
This would be the same public that the author claims to be protecting by ‘raising the bar’. How unfortunate to hold our clients in such contempt.
Mike Holmes has no doubt raised the profile of our indistry (sic) , and that’s about the only positive thing I can offer about him.
And this from a representative of an organization that has branded us all as incompetent without proof of these damaging and well publicized accusations. Laughable.
He is NOT a home inspector and never was one. He has NO defineable (sic) qualifications to perform home inspections or criticize those that do. His ‘inspections’ are performed using unrealistic, invasive measures that we can only dream about, yet the people watching eat it all up.
It’s called the entertainment media. You want to rail against it then you might as well tip at windmills too.
He roars on and on about untrained inspectors duping the public, when at the same time his own inspection business will accept pretty well anyone with a pulse who agrees to operate under Mike’s ridiculous one-sided rules and regulations. (He has some good inspectors, but he also has some real bad ones)
" He roars on and on about untrained inspectors duping the public" Sounds familiar. Could he have received his inspiration at the hands of those who say the same thing about all Canadian Home Inspectors, also without proof?
Anyone who has been interviewed for a position with his firm will know it’s more about what can be done for Mike’s benefit than how it will improve the inspector’s future.
The fact that a publicly subsidized community college has given him this opportunity is unfortunate, because they are basically recognizing him as ‘the expert’ about home inspections.
It should be pointed out that the author is / was a key member of a certain Canadian organization which thought that, the investment of thousands of their membership dollars to bring Holmes in to talk at their ‘national’ meeting, was a good idea. Funny how associating with Holmes was a good idea then and a bad one now.Hypocrisy at it’s finest.
Mike has had many chances to use his fame to help improve the quality of inspectors, but since there was no monetary payoff, he was never interested. I’ve never been able to understand why he has never adopted the requirements of OAHI’s RHI or the National Certification.
Could it have something to do with the people involved?
** Both are proven to be tested and recognized, yet he readily hires people with no more than the notorous (sic) online twenty minute test. **
"proven to be tested " by the same people who set the tests and gave the approvals. “recognized” by these same people who set the tests and gave the approvals. Cozy.:roll:
Thanks God I won’t be around this industry much longer.
Good news indeed !