# Nick Gromiko-Agreement Review **URL:** \ **Category:** Legislation, Licensing, Ethics & Legal Issues\ **Created:** [September 22, 2014, 10:00am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/nick-gromiko-agreement-review/90022 "2014-09-22T10:00:10Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 18
**Author:** ![lbeeman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/lbeeman/32/170799_2.png) [@lbeeman](https://forum.nachi.org/u/lbeeman)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2014, 8:13pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/nick-gromiko-agreement-review/90022/18 "2014-09-22T20:13:15Z")
> [@gromicko](#): > > LOL. So you really think a judge is going to disregard the rule of construction that states that a document is to be construed more strictly against the party who prepared it… because you got your client to agree to it in a document you prepared? C’mon. Get rid of this.\*\* It has to be the funniest thing I’ve ever read in an inspection agreement.\*\* Notice bold above: “It has to be the funniest thing I’ve ever read in an inspection agreement.” Not true. Reference an inspection agreement you previously reviewed that has same exact language in provision #12. Guess you did not see this or it wasn’t the funniest think you ever read in an inspection agreement at that point in time. LOL!! > **[Residential Pre-Inspection Agreement for Review](https://forum.nachi.org/t/85437)** > > Nick, I am taking you up on your offer too. Our draft agreement is cut/pasted below the dotted line. The paragraphs with an \* in front of them contain changes from the InterNACHI template. Can we also submit our mold, radon and thermal imaging... --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.nachi.org/t/nick-gromiko-agreement-review/90022)._