I have a question that might get things rolling and help a little recruiting at the same time.
Perhaps someone from California could answer the question: Why, out of the 51 states and multiple countries participating with NACHI — does California need it’s own, unique NACHI?
What is it about NACHI that falls short, that only a CalNACHI could fulfill?
When I started school, their were 48 states. Added to these were the state of Alaska, the state of Hawaii, and the state of malaise first induced by the Carter Administration.
And for people like me who were too involved with that wacky-tobacky to be able to remember much about what was happening around them, Dan Brokaw is re-running all of 1968 on the History Channel this month. Who knows…maybe there is another state added that we (I) don’t remember…
No disrespect to you John, or to Jim for that matter, but what makes this question deserving of an answer?
The simple fact of the matter is, a new association has been formed - for better or for worse. It will succeed or fail whether or not it has support from inspectors in other states.
Contrary to Jim’s intent with his original post, this forum was not created to debate the merits of CalNACHI.