Originally Posted By: roconnor This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
jquinn wrote:
F: Pools not included in inspection ![icon_lol.gif](upload://zEgbBCXRskkCTwEux7Bi20ZySza.gif) ![icon_lol.gif](upload://zEgbBCXRskkCTwEux7Bi20ZySza.gif)
Done ... and I voted for your suggested answer ... ![icon_lol.gif](upload://zEgbBCXRskkCTwEux7Bi20ZySza.gif)
-- Robert O'Connor, PE
Eagle Engineering ?
Eagle Eye Inspections ?
NACHI Education Committee
I am absolutely amazed sometimes by how much thought goes into doing things wrong
Originally Posted By: roconnor This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
" are included in the Standards of Practice. This would include checking that there is adequate grading for about 10’ around the building.
The depressed area is well away from the building, so the concern is not the grading or effect it may have on the building. However, a clearly depressed area at that distance from the building may indeed be a classic sign of a septic structure (or other buried structure, like a drywell) beginning to fail from cave-ins.
Although the condition of buried structures is beyond the scope of a basic inspection, something like that which is clearly visible while doing the exterior walk around should be noted to help keep your butt out of a sling ... ![eusa_shifty.gif](upload://rN4l1OcK3R92kuugwdpBnZUyCsg.gif)
As I said ... a sticky question. Larry gave a hint on where I was going with this one ...
-- Robert O'Connor, PE
Eagle Engineering ?
Eagle Eye Inspections ?
NACHI Education Committee
I am absolutely amazed sometimes by how much thought goes into doing things wrong