Seems OAHI his straining at the bit. On August 10, 2006 they sent me a Registered Letter. There are seven (7) letters informing me essentially that OAHI has rec'd seven (7) complaints against me all essentially stating that I stand accused of Conduct Unbecoming a Member for practicing while Retired, and using RHI and other statements which they say are Conduct Unbecoming. In the letters of August 10, 2006 I was given ten (10) days to reply or face further punitive action and that they will proceed with the original complaints. On August 18, 2006 I wrote my reply and sent it that day Registered Letter Mail.
Today I picked up another Registered Letter from OAHI informing me as per the attached document.
It seems the DPPC, and OAHI cannot count, has reasonable apprehension of bias and is being vexatious in its actions. How is possible to get a fair hearing with this sort of nonsense going on?
As you can see below I not only have the Postal stamp dating my Registered Letter as being sent on August 18, well within the ten (10) day period, (and that should be Business Days by-the-way, not just 10 days) but also have Canada Posts delivery print out to aid in my defence showing OAHI rec'd the letter on August 22! I also sent my reply of August 18, 2006 to the Association Counsel, Mr. Segal to ensure there was no Monkey business and have proof from Canada Post that the letter to Counsel was also sent August 18, 2006, and received by counsel on August 21, 2006.
Needless to say I will be replying to this latest gaff, and will be sending another copy of my reply to OAHI legal counsel Mr. Segal. I am sure he must have problems with the conduct OAHI is taking.
I am sure Claude Lawrenson will find this most disturbing, being Ethics Chair of the National Body of which OAHI is a signatory and goes hand in hand with my well voiced concerns about objectivity and fairness and reasonableness within OAHI vis-a-vis disciplining of members.