Reported Post by mlarson

Staff Reported Posts
21

He’s the $199 home inspector destroying the industry.

And a liar.

Here’s Johnny

Inspection Prices - Home Sight Inspection

John Paul de Oliveira

22

LOL

Johnny doing the bait and switch.

What a tool.

23

JJonas,

         Here you go Bud.  MLarson denied, on another thread, that he had failed, and was not deficient in electrical knowledge.   What a joke, and what a liar:p

It is easier to just go to the webpage than post screenshots of all ol’ Tubbee Mykee nonsense:

“Electrical Panel Inspection Training Video” course](https://www.nachi.org/forum/f74/electrical-panel-inspection-training-video-course-76449/index3.html)

Let’s see if he deletes his threads LOL;-)

For those too lazy to follow the link:

                 Originally Posted by **mlarson**                     [https://nachi.cachefly.net/forum/images/2006/buttons/viewpost.gif](https://www.nachi.org/forum/f74/electrical-panel-inspection-training-video-course-76449-post1106720/#post1106720)                 
             *The course test is flawed.

Ben has not responded to my email about the course. (Whiny Mike :D)
*
Ben: Michael. Unusual. I’ll search for some old emails that you may have sent. Sorry if I didn’t respond in the way you wanted. I simply don’t recall. I’ll check though. Flawed in what way?

M: I sent it to you on 10/17

The test requires intimate knowledge of the specific video presentation instead of the requirements.

Ben: Found it. October 17th email.

You said that you “failed the exam twice, then passed on the third time.”
Congrats, Michael. I knew you could do it.

You said, “In my opinion using specifics asking the detail of findings by Paul is too much detail to remember.” (Classic snowflake LOL :p)
Hm. Details are difficult to remember. I agree.

You said, “The videos were very good but the questions should reflect scenarios not necessarily tied to the specific detail within the videos.”
Again with the details.

You said, “The problem as I see it is that once you have watched the video you no longer have access to what the panel looked like.”
Yep. Watching a video of an electrical panel is not the same as actually having the panel in your hand. I agree. You can hit the “replay” button.

You said, “This could be remedied by providing hi res photos to examine like other courses contain.”
Good idea.

You said, “If you want to discuss, please contact me.”
I surely will.

Well, Michael. Thanks for the email. I really appreciate it.

Malarkey Larcen: It was meant to help others.

It’s more important to understand the concepts than it is to remember what you watched someone else find.

The test was poorly constructed in my opinion.

Thanks for your reply.

And finally from Ben G:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlarson https://nachi.cachefly.net/forum/images/2006/buttons/viewpost.gif
The course test is flawed.
Ben has not responded to my email about the course.

I’m still searching for your email about the exam. And its flaws.
When did you send it?

24

MLiarson:

Failed the simple electrical exam - TWICE and then whined about it. You are a snowflake:lol:

You are undoubtedly deficient in basic electrical inspection knowledge:roll:, and in addition are somewhat blind:roll:. Your clients are to be pitied.:sad:

And, as shown in this thread, a liar calling others telling the truth, liars.

Yo sho iz phonny

25

Post the actual screen grabs, NOT your typed out version of whatever is in your sordid head.
NO, I don’t click on links posted in MB’s by known ****heads.

Now STFU!

26

Even Ben agreed with me Johhny.

He appreciated my input and said so.

You are still a lowball inspector johhny and nothing can change that.