**Home inspector downplays major problems **
**Inspector Minimized Major Problems
The House Detective
by Barry Stone, Certified Building Inspector
BY BARRY STONE Oklahoman
0 </SPAN>Published: March 12, 2011
DEAR BARRY: When we bought our home, we hired a home inspector who was recommended by our real estate agent.
The inspection report contained what appeared to be two minor disclosures: “minor lean to the home” and “some minor seepage in the basement during heavy rain.” The only recommendation was “monitor for further movement.”
After we moved in, the rains came, and none of this turned out to be “minor.”
For nearly three months, we had a foot of water in the basement.
The contractor we hired found that the house is leaning nearly 9 inches.
Leveling the home and fixing the drainage will cost many thousands of dollars.
We do not believe our home inspector did a competent job. Instead, he portrayed major defects as no big deal.
Who is liable for the repairs, and what can we do about it?
DEAR TIM: There are two problems with the disclosures in the home inspection report: 1. Conditions such as leaning of a building and water intrusion in a basement should not be presumed to be minor; and 2. Such conditions warrant further evaluation by qualified experts.
Faulty drainage should have been reviewed by a geotechnical engineer. Leaning of the building called for analysis by a structural engineer. What you needed was someone who is licensed in both fields of engineering.
Instead of recommending that you “monitor for further movement,” the inspection report should have said, “Further evaluation by a qualified, licensed engineer is recommended before close of transaction.”
Your home inspector’s job was to point out significant defects and to make appropriate recommendations. Building settlement is obviously a major concern, as is water intrusion into the building. Determining the extent of these issues was not something to be done by monitoring movement after you purchased the property. You were in the process of making an important purchase decision. That was why you hired a home inspector. He should have considered this when making his recommendation.
Your home inspector may be liable for faulty disclosure, depending on the inspection contract that you signed and pertinent laws in your state. An attorney should evaluate those issues.
The sellers of the property may also share some liability. If they lived in the home for more than a year, they were probably aware of the drainage problem in the basement and should have disclosed it. And here’s a question for your real estate agent: Was this the most qualified inspector the agent knew? Some agents recommend the best home inspectors; some do not.
DEAR BARRY: I just bought a house with six large trees in the front yard and am worried about root damage in the main sewer line. The cost of repiping sends chills through my checkbook. Hardware stores sell products that claim to kill the roots in drainpipes. Are these products any good, or are they just a waste of money?
DEAR PAT: There are a number of effective root killers on the market. What you want is a product that contains copper sulfate and that foams when it is in the pipes. Be sure to look for those features when you read the product labels.
You should also consider hiring a plumber to do a video inspection of the drainpipe. Knowing the actual condition of the line will help you determine whether root killer or drainpipe replacement is needed.
To write to Barry Stone, visit him on the web at www.housedetective.com.
ACTION COAST PUBLISHING
Your home inspector’s job was to point out significant defects and to make appropriate recommendations.