Growing up **Whoopeeeee!**was a term of dismissal. Still is!
2 Likes
Wait for it… (her last statement says it all)…
This is all nonsense.
I was in IT. Data retention started during Sarbanes Oxley. 2002. A solid 6-8 years before Hillary’s email server was set up specifically to avoid reporting and retention of emails.
Everyone had email addresses by about 2000, the corporations I worked for had them in the mid 90s. I had one in 1993.
I had a small part in the Clinton transition in 1993. While we had one “company” email, I assure you, the departments all had emails.
You may be younger but I assure you, there was no other reason for Hillary to set up that server than to avoid accountability. None. She could have had data services out the wazoo if she had asked.
4 Likes
I see it as a Zoë Baird problem. The kind of thing that was no big deal, until it was a big deal for political purposes. The deletion of the personal emails later, was a really bad move, no matter who did it and why. Terrible optics.
Women on TikTok are posting videos about voting for Kamala Harris while their parents vote for Trump. They show themselves leaving to vote, sometimes dancing or doing other gestures with their ballots.
So at the risk of throwing myself under the bus, lol.
This link is from Debra Von Trapp. I met this woman. I worked for Peter Stanley for a company called Valcom Computers. Our main facility was in Wooster Ohio, I worked for National Accounts out of Canton Ohio. My boss was Peter Stanley. Peter was not a spook. He was a manic depressive. Fun when he’s up, the devil when he’s down. I just refer to him as “Satan”. ie. when I worked for Satan in the 90s.
I helped set up Hillary’s first Apple computer. We unboxed it, configured it and took it to DC to install it.
It was because of this pressure of getting a calls on Friday at 2pm to get product to a speech by Bill the next morning. I’d air freight this stuff out of Hawaii. It was nuts. About 6 months after we started doing this EOP thing, I quit.
Goetzman definitely was CIA. Zero doubt in my mind. I didn’t know it at the time, I just thought he was a contractor. Nice enough guy, but always felt a bit off.
1 Like
See, this is where you’re wrong. It was very clear when Sarbox became law.
We had to hire these data retention companies, like Iron Mountain and a couple others to maintain redundant backups. The penalties were and still are severe. Everyone in IT was aware of it because someone had to manage it. Bigger companies needed to have someone who’s job was partially or entirely dedicated to data retention.
No IT person who could set up even a SBS wouldn’t know this. Hell, during the install process of the email servers they pretty much require you to dedicate space for retention. No one who has the skill to do it wouldn’t be aware of it. You can’t even delete anything from the operator interface, it won’t let you.
As I said, Hillary could have had anything she wanted except total privacy for government related work.
2 Likes
Not just the email but a server in her basement for government correspondence as well as classified documents. Meanwhile she lectured her staff about the importance of electronic security. She should have just given the Russians and chinese the classified stuff. She just wanted to evade the freedom of information act. Because the Clinton’s are special and don’t deserve public scrutiny. She is nothing but a common tramp, using Bill an authentic misogynist and her party to ladder climb Her chief of staff’s password was “password.” Real intelligent crowd.
Might as well get the timeline straight, even if the motive will be open to interpretation:
In December 2014, after the work-related emails were preserved, Mills told Platte River Networks – which at the time was managing Clinton’s private server – that Clinton “decided she no longer needed access to any of her e-mails older than 60 days.” Mills instructed the PRN employee — who was not identified — “to modify the e-mail retention policy” on Clinton’s server “to reflect this change,” the FBI said.
But the PRN employee mistakenly did not make the retention-policy change and did not delete the old emails until sometime between March 25 and March 31, even though Mills had sent PRN an email on March 9 that mentioned the committee’s request to preserve emails.
The PRN employee who deleted the emails was a recipient of Mills’ message. However, the employee told the FBI that “he had an ‘oh shit’ moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from the PRN server and used BleachBit to delete the exported .PST files he had created on the server containing Clinton’s e-mails.”
…The PRN employee responsible for deleting the emails was advised by his lawyer not to discuss his conversation…
Merrill said “her decision to not to retain her personal emails” was made before the subpoena was issued. That is accurate. The decision was made, but not executed.
Kinda’ hard to prove, now isn’t it. She’s a sleazebag and should have been criminally charged.
Optics? It was illegal. It should have been "one of 34 felonies’, eh? Who hell knows what she deleted
“Intentionally deleted” What an eff’n farce. The law was broken but the will to prosecute did not exist. This folks, is the Deep State.
4 Likes
I did not know this… 
Philly is 99% slum. They still can not vote in Federal Elections. Democrats are trying to blur the law so that mail in votes from illegal aliens will be mistakenly counted in Federal elections. This has been going on for some time. It is why they so vigorously reject voter ID!