# Three-conductor cable for whole house

**URL:** <https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236>\
**Category:** Electrical Inspections\
**Created:** [October 21, 2019, 11:27am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236 "2019-10-21T11:27:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matwood](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/matwood/32/59825_2.png) [@matwood](https://forum.nachi.org/u/matwood)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2019, 11:27am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/1 "2019-10-21T11:27:11Z")

</div>

I inspected a home that had three-conductor cables throughout all of the electrical system. Usually I see two-conductor cables for 120 outlets and three-conductor cables are just used for the dryer, stove, and water heater. Does anyone see anything wrong with three-conductor cables being used for all electric needs in the home? The home was built in 2006.

 ![20191008_190110](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/original/3X/e/8/e8301516718d7b49844c1688f43b430eda8167ba.jpeg) ![20191008_190037](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/original/3X/c/4/c4392c588686a07689604e93f773c2297afe1a8f.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mgratton](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/mgratton/32/58251_2.png) [@mgratton](https://forum.nachi.org/u/mgratton)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2019, 12:04pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/2 "2019-10-21T12:04:33Z")

</div>

I usually see them for 240V appliances, kitchen split plus and sometimes workshop but that should not be a problem. The missing tie-bars are though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmeier2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rmeier2/32/59909_2.png) [@rmeier2](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rmeier2)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2019, 12:15pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/3 "2019-10-21T12:15:40Z")

</div>

MWBC’s are perfectly acceptable, newer versions of the NEC require that the single pole CB’s have a handle tie or that a multi-pole CB is used.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mparks2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/mparks2/32/172915_2.png) [@mparks2](https://forum.nachi.org/u/mparks2)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2019, 1:35pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/4 "2019-10-21T13:35:12Z")

</div>

And the famous two wires under a lug.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jmilby](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/jmilby/32/57038_2.png) [@jmilby](https://forum.nachi.org/u/jmilby)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 2:40am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/5 "2019-10-22T02:40:02Z")

</div>

And your point is? You have stated quite a few times that this is not an issue in Ohio. Are you changing sides now?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mparks2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/mparks2/32/172915_2.png) [@mparks2](https://forum.nachi.org/u/mparks2)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 2:42am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/6 "2019-10-22T02:42:53Z")

</div>

I stated a fact. Never said right or wrong. That is up to each inspector to decide how they report it, if they report it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ggilbert](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/ggilbert/32/184784_2.png) [@ggilbert](https://forum.nachi.org/u/ggilbert)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 4:50am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/7 "2019-10-22T04:50:32Z")

</div>

Just incase I ever run into this??? I don’t understand the reasoning! Or how it even works since the red and black wire will end up at the same point even though they are on two separate breakers, can someone explain this to me! Are the wires going to a junction box and then ran different directions from there with 12/2 wire?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cevans](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/cevans/32/244194_2.png) [@cevans](https://forum.nachi.org/u/cevans)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 5:23am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/8 "2019-10-22T05:23:06Z")

</div>

It’s a cheaper way of wiring, because they can run two 120V circuits from a single cable with 4 wires using a multiwire branch circuit, instead of running 2 separate cables with 3 wires each.

There are some unique characteristics to it. The red and black wires each serve a different set of devices or outlets, however they share the same grounded (white) conductor and equipment ground. Each of the ungrounded conductors (red and black) must be on separate phases. On a 120/240V system, they must have 240V potential between them to prevent overloading of the shared white conductor (with 240V potential between the ungrounded conductors, the grounded conductor will carry the difference in amperage rather than the sum of the two). Because the grounded conductor serves both breakers, it’s unsafe to work on either circuit unless both are deenergized, which is why the two breakers are supposed to share a handle tie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmeier2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rmeier2/32/59909_2.png) [@rmeier2](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rmeier2)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 10:37am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/9 "2019-10-22T10:37:18Z")

</div>

Nice description chuck. 🕶

With the advent of AFCI circuit breakers and the handle tie rule (which I hate) MWBC’s in homes are a dying breed. If not for those two things I would still use them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rlewis5](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rlewis5/32/337040_2.png) [@rlewis5](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rlewis5)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 11:05am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/10 "2019-10-22T11:05:58Z")

</div>

It early!  
What is a MWBC ?  
Multi wire branch circuits?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rkenney](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rkenney/32/405447_2.png) [@rkenney](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rkenney)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 11:19am UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/11 "2019-10-22T11:19:50Z")

</div>

What year did the NEC implement the handle tie rule?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ggilbert](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/ggilbert/32/184784_2.png) [@ggilbert](https://forum.nachi.org/u/ggilbert)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 12:15pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/12 "2019-10-22T12:15:11Z")

</div>

Thanks for making this make sense to me, so then in Matthews photo the system should be reported on as a safety issue because of the breakers not tied together according to Robert. Also the breaker alignment would have to have the red and black wire breakers side by side to have handle ties which would also make the power supplied rooms side by side to each other because the 3/G wire would start out at the one spot and then feed 2 separate areas from there, sounds confusing but I believe I got it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rkenney](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rkenney/32/405447_2.png) [@rkenney](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rkenney)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 1:18pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/14 "2019-10-22T13:18:56Z")

</div>

It gets more confusing when the multiwire circuit occurs among half size breakers. In the picture below the two ungrounded conductors must still be on two separate phases. So the red ungrounded conductor must share a grounded conductor with a black ungrounded conductor in an entirely separate (adjacent) breaker slot. This home was built in 94, before the handle tie rule, although I’m not sure exactly what year the rule changed? ![Cornshock001](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/original/3X/1/9/192d8ba18dd2a5ac9e2ef7f08f4032370fc76ecf.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmeier2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rmeier2/32/59909_2.png) [@rmeier2](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rmeier2)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 2:02pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/15 "2019-10-22T14:02:39Z")

</div>

> [@rkenney](#):
>
> What year did the NEC implement the handle tie rule?

210.4(B) first appeared in the 2008 NEC which covered all MWBC’s. There were two similar rules in earlier editions of the NEC which required simultaneous disconnect for multiple circuits one the same yoke (such as a duplex receptacle) and for office furniture partitions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rkenney](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rkenney/32/405447_2.png) [@rkenney](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rkenney)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 3:08pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/16 "2019-10-22T15:08:07Z")

</div>

Thanks for the response. I would of thought is was earlier than that. 1999 NEC says:

210.4(b) Dwelling Units. In dwelling units, a multiwire branch  
circuit supplying more than one device or equipment on the  
same yoke shall be provided with a **means to disconnect**  
**simultaneously all ungrounded conductors** at the panelboard  
where the branch circuit originated.

That language persisted through 2005. 2008 says:

(B) Disconnecting Means. Each multiwire branch circuit  
shall be provided with a **means that will simultaneously**  
**disconnect all ungrounded conductors** at the point where  
the branch circuit originates.

Although the language changed they seem to say the same thing. “disconnect simultaneously” or “simultaneously disconnect” Don’t have anything before 1999.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gwells](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/gwells/32/417638_2.png) [@gwells](https://forum.nachi.org/u/gwells)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 4:17pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/17 "2019-10-22T16:17:33Z")

</div>

Money. Money. Money.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmeier2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rmeier2/32/59909_2.png) [@rmeier2](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rmeier2)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/18 "2019-10-22T16:29:53Z")

</div>

> [@rkenney](#):
>
> Although the language changed they seem to say the same thing. “disconnect simultaneously” or “simultaneously disconnect” Don’t have anything before 1999

They’re similar but not the same. The pre-2008 language applied only when it fed two circuits on one yoke, like a duplex receptacle. 2008 expanded that to include all MWBC’s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rkenney](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/rkenney/32/405447_2.png) [@rkenney](https://forum.nachi.org/u/rkenney)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 6:03pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/19 "2019-10-22T18:03:40Z")

</div>

Thanks again, a good example of what happens if you don’t read **all** the words. To compound the confusion I found the following illustration in an NFPA publication (pre-2008). Proper illustration, just lacking the words “same yoke’”

 ![191022-135042_p1](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/original/3X/5/e/5e85373bdea0c074648a3cc1fb9d04aaeca46261.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![srechkin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/srechkin/32/180448_2.png) [@srechkin](https://forum.nachi.org/u/srechkin)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 6:30pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/20 "2019-10-22T18:30:52Z")

</div>

You save a few bucks on the cable & installation, but what happens to the connected equipment should you lose neutral 😃 Would not have it in my house, not worth the risk, don’t like 'em.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dhorton2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/user_avatar/forum.nachi.org/dhorton2/32/178593_2.png) [@dhorton2](https://forum.nachi.org/u/dhorton2)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2019, 7:31pm UTC](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236/21 "2019-10-22T19:31:38Z")

</div>

> [@rkenney](#):
>
> It gets more confusing when the multiwire circuit occurs among half size breakers. In the picture below the two ungrounded conductors must still be on two separate phases. So the red ungrounded conductor must share a grounded conductor with a black ungrounded conductor in an entirely separate (adjacent) breaker slot. This home was built in 94, before the handle tie rule, although I’m not sure exactly what year the rule changed?

So I assume the slim breakers are always on the same phase, then?  
Thx

[Next page](https://forum.nachi.org/t/three-conductor-cable-for-whole-house/157236.md?page=2)
