U.S. Member of the Year Nominations 2008

It is with pleasure tonight to announce a Nomination for:

U.S. Member of the Year Award

Nominee: Kenneth Sitzes
ghinspector@yahoo.com
Telephone: 618-[size=2]830-8283[/size]

Mr. Ken Sitzes is deserving of this award for all his efforts in **
establishing the NACHI, State Approved, Continuing Education Program **
http://www.nachi.org/statece.htm](http://www.nachi.org/statece.htm)
(**http://www.nachi.org/state_ce.htm](http://www.nachi.org/state_ce.htm)
) **

**Mr. Sitzes has given considerable time and energy into the promotion of this **
program which benefits all NACHI members

**iNACHI U.S. Member of the YEAR
**

Article 1 – Introduction

The iNACHI U.S. Member of the Year program was created to publicly recognize a U.S. iNACHI member for superior performance during the calendar year, January 1st thru December 31st.

Article 2 – Description of the Program

The award will be presented to any iNACHI member selected based on exceptional contributions to the iNACHI Association, fellow members, and their individual local community in the following areas:

I. Performs “beyond the call of duty” to improve the service, quality, or image of iNACHI.
II. Exemplifies professionalism and dedication to excellent service by putting forth the extra effort.
III. Makes outstanding contributions of significance to the iNACHI organization to fulfill its mission.

The iNACHI Awards Committee is the final authority of issuance of this award.

Article 3 – Eligibility

**All U.S. members of the iNACHI Association are eligible. (Employees, officers, directors, staff, and members who have been compensated are not eligible). **

Article 4 – Submission Guidelines

Entries are for the period of January 1st thru December 31st of any given year.

Deadline for submission of nominations is set for December 10th of each year.

Candidates are nominated by any group, committee, or member of the iNACHI organization by forwarding a letter or email to the iNACHI Awards Committee with all supporting documentation and recommendations. All submissions received will be considered. Those lacking substantiate supporting documentation may be returned to the submitter for further documentation, verification, or clarification.

**Mr. Kenneth Sitzes, **

My Congratulations.

**Marcel :smile: :grin: **