Originally Posted By: Caoimh?n P. Connell
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Hello Mr. Gettier ?
Regarding your humidity question. You first have to ask ?Why do I want to control relative humidity?? If the answer is to meet local building code, then that becomes the de facto maximum allowable %RH (all reason notwithstanding).
However, if you want to control %RH for, say mould growth, then that is a very complex issue. There is no correlation between relative humidity (%RH) and mold growth outside the context of dew point temperatures and especially dew point temperatures on surfaces
In mycological terms, moisture is described by ?water activity,? (
aW). Water activity is expressed as the ratio of the vapour pressure of the water in the air in equilibrium with a substance divided by the vapour pressure at the same temperature of pure water. The
aW values range from 1.0 (for free standing water) to 0.7 for hard candy and dried cereals and fruits.
The percent relative humidity is the ratio of the partial pressure of water present in an air mass to the partial pressure of water at saturation for the same temperature and pressure. Therefore, although a physical relationship exists between the relative humidity and the
aW, it is very complex and not particularly easy to use in everyday life. This is because the
aw will be different for different substrates even if the %RH and the temperatures are exactly the same.
Let?s look at a simple example of just the temperature and moisture complexities - Posit a summer day in Colorado with a relative humidity of only 35% and an outdoor temperature of 98?F, the outdoor air will contain approximately 16 grams of water per cubic meter of air (16 g/m3). Crawlspace vents are closed and %RH in the crawlspace is also 35% relative humidity. However, the temperature in the crawler is 65?F and, therefore, the air in the crawler only contains about 5.6 g/m3.
The minimum temperature needed to precipitate the water from the outdoor air is only 66?F (the dew-point). That means that if the air temperature or surface temperatures in the crawlspace are less than or equal to 66?F, and outdoor air enters, the %RH in the crawlspace will skyrocket to 100% RH and the moisture from the outdoor air drawn into the crawlspace will precipitate onto those surfaces (even though the actual moisture content in the air has not changed). The condensed moisture may provide a water source for mold to grow. If the effect is prolonged, and wood may remain damp, and the probability is that molds will proliferate. In this way, fans meant to ?dehumidify? crawlspaces actually defeating their own purposes by increasing the potential humidity in the crawlspace.
OK .. now same house? Outdoor temperature is 10?F and 35% relative humidity, therefore the air outside contains about 1.9 g/m3. The crawler is 37? and also 35% relative humidity (the air contains 2.1 g/m3). What happens when outside air is drawn into the crawler? %RH drops, because the not only does the incoming air contain less moisture, as the air mass is warmed the %RH does down.
The point of all this is that one CANNOT discuss %RH in the absence of 1) Temperature 2) Ventilation considerations 3) Surrounding structures 4) context (comfort, bugs, regulations, etc).
Now, weather is weird - at the moment, on this fine Colorado July afternoon, in Denver it is 104?F, but where I am in Colorado, I am sitting at my desk looking at ? SNOW! That?s right, snow. Furthermore, the relative humidity will change with altitude, so even if you specify a particular %RH, at what elevation is that value good for?
More simplictically, overall, what we see is that very high relative humidities (in excess of 90% sustained) are required to achieve a sufficient
aW to support microbial growth of xerophilic/xerotolerant fungi at room temperatures at 2,000 meters elevation. Some of my work indicates that in the absence of dew point considerations on surfaces, mould growth will not occur on inoculated wooden surfaces even at sustained relative humidities of 90%
I hope that clears things up a bit. I know it was good for me.
Cheers,
Caoimh?n P. Connell
Forensic Industrial Hygienist
www.forensic-applications.com
(The opinions expressed here are exclusively my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect my professional opinion, opinion of my employer, agency, peers, or professional affiliates. The above post is for information only and does not reflect professional advice and is not intended to supercede the professional advice of others.)
AMDG