58 pictures for a wind mit

[rthurman (Richard A. Thurman)]

@jmurray4

Hey Richard,

I sincerely wish you a great deal of success with this. Believe me, I would love a tool that I could use to instantly determine hidden nail sizes.

However, if you want to be successful as a Wind Mitigation provider. I strongly suggest that you recognize 3 things:

1. That you are a service provider within a LARGER industry that has set expectation. Failure to meet those set expectations will invalidate your service.

2. You must read, reread, and completely understand the 1802. You cannot, as so many like to do, interpret the 1802 to your own alternate understanding. Believe it or not, the document is very specific many ways.

3. You must provide results that you can document and defend if questioned.

Having said all this. Only photographic documentation of an actual nail will be acceptable. If you use any scanner to document nail size, the wind mit will likely be rejected.

Maybe some day I will become successful since I’ve only personally conducted something slightly less than 7,000 of these darn things.

First of all, I hope you’ve read and understand the 1802 better than you did my post because I never said anything about getting instans results. What I did talk about was if it actually worked was possibly using it in a situation as in John’s post or in a situation where you could find no shiner’s or sideslpitters in an attic.

The sources I’ve heard about this from, are ones that I trust. Again, I only asked if anyone had expierence using the product. Just because something hasn’t been used in a specific situation doesn’t mean it won’t work. This is why I said I might buy one and eperiment with it.

You did get the e-mail the world round and not flat right.

[jmurray4 (Jay C. Murray)]

@rthurman

Maybe some day I will become successful since I’ve only personally conducted something slightly less than 7,000 of these darn things.

First of all, I hope you’ve read and understand the 1802 better than you did my post because I never said anything about getting instans results. What I did talk about was if it actually worked was possibly using it in a situation as in John’s post or in a situation where you could find no shiner’s or sideslpitters in an attic.

The sources I’ve heard about this from, are ones that I trust. Again, I only asked if anyone had expierence using the product. Just because something hasn’t been used in a specific situation doesn’t mean it won’t work. This is why I said I might buy one and eperiment with it.

You did get the e-mail the world round and not flat right.

Experiment away. Let us all know how it goes. :roll:

Bye the way, what are you going to tell Universal or another underwriter when they ask for the missing photos documenting 8 d nails? :shock:

7K wind mits or not, it sounds like a hard sell.

Maybe, they will agree with you…The world is nolonger flat. LOL :—)