Every committee has an area of the board that is accesible only to its members, I believe these currently include:
Education
ESOP
Awards
MAB
Convention planning etc
If the MAB chose to have a discussion amonst themselves away from this board what of it? It is no different to the ESOP handling complaints via email which is my understanding of how they do that.
The MAB has used a discussion chat room bb owned by one of it’s members as a place to “meet”. No different than using email, or conference calls among it’s members, except that it is cheaper.
I don’t have access to the education or esop forums, and probably others. Most members don’t have access to many of the committee forums. Is there a difference?
I would hope there is when the MAB has to talk about things and make a decision .
The same things goes on in many places in this world as well as NACHI that are not any of my business.
If and when decisions are made then I expect we the Members should be told if necessary.
How could the awards committee make any decisions if every one was able to see what the discusions are about .
I would say if you have a particular interest in any Board then try and get a position .
Surprise many boards need ( ACTIVE ) members .
Don"t complain become active
Roy Cooke Sr . Royshomeinspection
Here is one for the membership. The MAB had a discussion and proposed to Nick to inform every member that signed up for the convention that there would no longer be any food. Nick receives the email and doesn’t notify the 400+ in attendance at the opening ceremony. A MAB member (ME) spoke with many inspectors about the reasons why.
Nick you can post a new thread containing trash but can’t start a thread about the lack of food and the reasons why. Go figure.
Big difference than answering emails. The MAB recently put forth a proposal out of nowhere that appears to require the most active people at NACHI to step down.
Don’t you think we deserve to see the discussion that lead up to this proposal?