Builder's Hold Harmless

Originally Posted By: pdacey
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



It seems that most builders here in San Antonio have a Hold Harmless Agreement that they require inspectors sign before they are allowed on the property. This is for private HIs that are doing inspections for the buyer after the house is complete, not the city inspectors.


I would like some opinions on this. It seems that there are some inspectors that won't do the inspections because of the agreement and others that don't care and just sign it anyway. I'm on the fence. I have an inspection scheduled for next week that requires me to sign the agreement.

Here's the agreement verbatim. To protect the innocent (or guilty) I changed the builder's name to just "Builder".

Quote:
This Hold Harmless Agreement is entered into by and between "Builder" (hereinafter called "builder") and _____________ (hereinafter called Inspector)

"Builder" shall not be liable or responsible for, and shall be saved and held harmless by inspector from and against any and all suits, actions, losses, damages, claims, or liability of any character, type, or description, including all expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees for injury or death to any person, or injury to any property, received or sustained by any person or persons or property, arising out of, or occasioned by, directly or indirectly, by any act or omission of Inspector while on the property being inspected pursuant to this agreement, including claims and damages arising in whole or in part from the negligence of "Builder".

It is the express intent of the parties to this agreement that the indemnity provided for in this section is an indemnity extended by Inspector to indemnify and protect "Builder" from the consequences of "Builders'" own negligence, wether that negligence is the sole or contributory cause of the resultant injury, death, or damage.

It is the expressed intention of the Inspector and "Builder" that the indemnity provided for in this agreement is designed and intended to protect "Builder" from the consequences of defects in the property being inspected pursuant to this agreement.

SIGNED this ___________ day of ___________________, 2002


"Builder"
By:_______________

Its: _______________

Inspector
____________________


What do you guys think?


--
Slainte!

Patrick Dacey
swi@satx.rr.com
TREC # 6636
www.southwestinspections.com

Originally Posted By: Guest
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



It sounds to me like the builder is afraid he left a rafter out and you’ll fall through the roof. It’s all fine except the exclusion that states he won’t be responsible even if it’s caused by his negligence.


On the other hand the odds of being injured because of his negligence are low for a prudent and careful inspector guy like yourself.


Originally Posted By: pdacey
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



Chad,


That is part of the reason why I don't have too much of a problem with it. All the agreement is doing is taking the builder out of the equation if I get hurt or if my tools get hurt due to something being not quite right in the house.

We expose ourselves to that risk every day when we inspect houses that are "used", meaning no more builder. It is up to our inspecting prowess to identify potentially hazardous situations before we get hurt.

Am I wrong on this?


--
Slainte!

Patrick Dacey
swi@satx.rr.com
TREC # 6636
www.southwestinspections.com

Originally Posted By: Guest
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



I’d sign it if it meant a job.


Chad


Originally Posted By: jonofrey
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



I agree.



Inspection Nirvana!


We're NACHI. Get over it.

Originally Posted By: Blaine Wiley
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



Sign it. Any good lawyer can beat it, just like any good lawyer can beat our pre inspection agreement. I have three builders that have me sign them, and I’m sure more to come.


Originally Posted By: pdacey
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



That’s what I thought.


Thanks guys.

Besides, the house in question is over 4000 sq/ft ...and when you charge by the sq/ft....that's a lot of... well you know.


--
Slainte!

Patrick Dacey
swi@satx.rr.com
TREC # 6636
www.southwestinspections.com

Originally Posted By: kwilliams
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



I Agree with


Originally Posted By: psabados
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



Sign it


Then atferwards set up a chorus line, after all is 4000 sq.ft.

![](upload://b9T5sU88SiVTYSGbwoVoDrjWwdf.jpeg)

A good job deserves a good reward

Paul


Originally Posted By: jpeck
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



When you sign it, tell the builder you’ll give him “special” treatment, and give your report to the building department so he won’t have to worry about arguing any of the points in your report, you will talk directly with the building department., you know, to “save him from going to any trouble”. icon_biggrin.gif



Jerry Peck


South Florida

Originally Posted By: ecrofutt
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



I think I’d have my lawyer reveiw it the first time. It may cover a little bit more indemnity than y’all see.



Erby Crofutt


B4U Close Home Inspections


Georgetown, Kentucky



www.b4uclose.com

Originally Posted By: pdacey
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.



Ahhhh! Paul, you read my mind.



Slainte!


Patrick Dacey
swi@satx.rr.com
TREC # 6636
www.southwestinspections.com