You are claiming Jim.
Jim, you were a OntarioACHI BOD.
A PHPIC member.
A CMI.
Could you please tell everyone what happened.
I have no clue what you are talking about.
Now please answer my questions as you are in breach of the COE that you preach to everyone else
Or are you allowing someone else to use your account again?
Hello Paul - I take it from your earlier post that you are not just a “student inspector”, but actually have been around for was it about 18 years.
Are you still busy with “inspection reports”? Your inspector buddies at ISS wish you well.
Be careful in what you post here, since the pot is often stirred and often gets slopped onto any nearby bystanders!
Cluade, with all due respect, I am sure Lenard points are valid.
Paul Bousquet
Student Inspector at InterNACHI.
As with the AIBQ, the same rules applied.
From what I understand, all associations have their requirements.
I hope Paul uses InterNACHI’s wonderful resources to help members on the MB. It would surely be appreciated.
Best.
Robert
Robert - I’m not disputing Lens comments. I’m simply noting there’s enough “misinformation” floating about here, without knowing the real facts, or the acceptance of those facts.
If I sign up for courses does that not make me a student? Or is it simply that one chooses to enter under the “student” category?
I see his (Paul’s) registration date as Oct 2017, so perhaps just a recent interest with InterNACHI.
Claude, I concur. Truly.
Being one for jocularity, I had to laugh when “stir the pot” reference arose.
Claude, Good chefs always stir the pot and sample what’s cooking. It’s when too many chefs are creating one dish the flavor is lost.
Back to your thoughts about, “misinformation”
A way to circumvent “misinformation” is through open transparent communications.
I reached out to one of InterNACHI Quebec’s BEST spokes persons.
We both realised this issue must be tackled to be resolved, and reassured each other more effort will be put into our communications.
Much thanks InterNACHI Quebec spokesperson.
You’re the best!
Kindest regards.
Robert
Robert - unfortunately some honest to goodness real factual information gets sidelined by rumors, misinformation, misunderstanding and outright BS.
Perhaps those that judge need to consider the word and meaning of transparency.
As some have alluded and some have stated - some information is privy to the associations and their BODs, and or those that are warranted to “their” members. So get over it, or join.
Again some just are stating that the ongoing continuous harangue of airing dirty laundry does nothing to the word “professionalism” and the sectors public image perception.
For the record am a new member, with 18 years in the business with CAHPI / AIBQ as a Certified Inspector. Registration to InterNachi got done real quick because of a special circumstance. So no am not a student. Status should be revised shortly
Claude, you truly defend the defenseless.
Involuntarily registration *** at the very least*** is unethical and a COE violation.
At the most, likely a mistomener crime.
I did not sign-up, in-role, nor register to join.
I have made my self clear more than once…in other words, this has happened more than once.
Think there is a problem?
It could have been all cleared up on the second post.
IT WAS NOT.
I took the high road.
May I recoimmend, allow others to fight thier own battles. Maskes you look bad.
Good day.
Welcome aboard Paul Glad for you and us .
With all due respect, Claude…
Do not single me out. Address the strings in order please, author by author.
Been here long enough. I am capable of wading through the trouble makers BS. Go talk to the string chefs that post the BS.
Such as you.
I am not an enrolee of the chapter. I did not join.
I have seen several new InterNACHI memebers ask do they need to join InterNACHI Quebec to be a memeber.
I would certainly like to know if there are ANY InterNACHI Quebec mambers that have been enroled without due process and are to afarid to speak out though.
The sad thing is, this could have been cleared up by the second post.
Get over what? Involuntary enrolment?
Claude, it certainly appears you have chosen a side.
Too bad. So, sad.
Lets say you are seated on a comittee, again, and complaints are being addressed. What would you say about, Involuntary Mebership Enrolment?
I am not kidding Claude. Brush aside what has transpired between associations. Be, and remain, neutral.
What would you say about, Involuntary Mebership Enrolment?
I got through this, again, by being the bigger InterNACHI memeber and reaching out.
Apprecate those devoted memebers that selfless give without taking or asking for something in return.
No sir, the ongoing continuous harangue of airing dirty laundry does nothing to the word “professionalism” and the sectors public image perception is not being properly addressed when being bias and addressing your post using my name.
Shame on you. I am offened.
May I recommend stepping back and being neutral once and awhile?
You might learn from the experance.
Best.
Robert Young InterNACHI memeber.
Claude, I am truly disappointed in your perception of the matter at hand.
Maybe you should step back and look at the subject, not the players.
Best.
Robert.
I concur.
Unfortunately some honest to goodness real factual information gets sidelined in posts like this.
1: You must come to realize, indaviduals join when asked.
2: This is not about a duty to insuance providers and do not try to disguse this as such.
It is about SOP, The Standards of Practice to cunsumers, provided by a home inspector period!
Roy
What you cannot get thru your head is that Ontario Inspectors do not post here anymore because of YOU
We all help on Facebook where antics like yours are not tolerated.
If you posted in any of the groups the BS you post here you would be booted.
You keep posting here
I do not think you have posted any good information for a long time .
Sure lots no information posts…
I wish you well sorry you closed up your business .
https://www.nachi.org/forum/users/jmosiuk/ 4 friends
InterNACHI®️ Forum 329 Friends
I post to correct your BS
Why would you be sorry. I am having a blast travelling now that I retired.
How do you feel now that no Ontario Inspectors come here for help because of YOU?
Does that make you feel important?
Certified Inspector.
Happy things are moving in the right direction.
Grandfathering has been a contentious subject to some.
I personally favour the motion under certain warranted/special circumstances/conditions.
Best of luck with all your endeavors.
Hopefully we will all learn more, when the timing is right.
Keep us posted if you can.
Thanks for the update Paul. No insult intended and sorry if it came across that way, but as you read these threads you will no doubt get to share the frustration some of us have with the constant defamation form a few that call themselves “Ambassadors” for the Home Inspection Profession.
The matter at hand was about report verification - aka - monitoring. I see no problem with it as a requirement. Is it not part of becoming a CMI, RHI, NHI and the list goes on.
Than again perhaps some people circumvented that step.
Claude, thank you for your reply. Always appreciated.
I see no problem with any requirement/s if/when they are completely spelled out, real reasons given, and sent through the proper channels to be reviewed for members.
When it come with fees attached, members should be able to ask (valid) questions and receive the correct information.
I do see a problem when;
A: No one from the chapter entered the thread to explain why I received an email asking me to submit a report.
B: I sent out several emails to call me or email me back that went on deft ears.
C: I had to be the adult in the room and reach out.
Much thanks. Truly.
Best regards.
Robert