President Trump: when a U.S. company hires a talented foreign employee, it helps all Americans

When Microsoft hires high-tech talent from a foreign country and brings them here… that employee pays taxes here: income tax, state tax, gas tax, etc. And when they move here, they spend their income here: housing, clothes, cars, restaurants… which is good for the economy.

It’s called “brain draining” where we hire the best of the best from around the world and move them here. Don’t make that more difficult.

For the U.S. company, our governments, and our economy… it’s a win-win-win.

3 Likes

There has been a well documented brain drain out of the US since Trump 2. Evidently we don’t want to be the world leader any more? Yes, being a world leader costs money.

‘We’re no longer attracting top talent’: the brain drain killing American science

2 Likes

There’s a country full of talented people right here. Microsoft brought in cheap labor from India, etc. Microsoft is a publicly traded company. They are all about profit.

1 Like

7,600 FAKE NURSES In Your Hospitals RIGHT NOW: They Bought Diplomas, Skipped Training, and Are Treating Real Patients – Lives on the Line!

Your Nurse’s Diploma Might Be Fake… and It Could Cost Lives. ☠️

Over 7,600 counterfeit nursing diplomas (and likely tens of thousands more) were sold by a massive fraud ring (Operation Nightingale). International candidates — many from India and Haiti — paid $10K–$15K for phony credentials from shuttered Florida “schools.”

No real classes. No hands-on training. They simply bought the paperwork, sat the NCLEX exam, got licensed in multiple states, and walked straight into U.S. hospitals.

While qualified American nurses invest years and tens of thousands to save lives, these impostors took the shortcut — and corporate healthcare let them in, chasing cheap labor. Big Medicine and the AMA were complicit.

This isn’t ancient history. Phase 2 is unfolding. These “nurses” are still out there: adjusting IVs, dispensing meds, making life-or-death calls in ERs and ICUs across America.

Patient safety isn’t optional. Merit isn’t optional. Trust in medicine isn’t optional.

Real nurses are burning out fighting real shortages. The system imported unvetted “talent” instead of fixing root causes.

Demand nationwide credential audits NOW. Revoke every fake license. Prosecute buyers and sellers.

Deport the fraudsters. Rebuild standards before one more patient pays the ultimate price.

Your mother. Your child. Your family. In the hands of someone who never earned the title.

How many more fields have been compromised?

Engineering? Aviation? Medicine?

The rabbit hole is wider and deeper than you think.

Repost if you want REAL accountability in healthcare. Standards over shortcuts. Competence over cost-cutting. America First. 💉🩺🇺🇸

#FakeNurses #NursingFraud #OperationNightingale #HealthcareScam #PatientSafetyCrisis #CredentialFraud #AmericaFirstHealthcare #DeportTheFakes

1 Like

Is there? DEI, meritless, quota based US universities are not producing quality employees. So employers are reaching to cultures that produce disciplined and performance based employees.

I hope we return to the grit that makes America great, but leftist wokism, victimization and the DSA are rotting our education system.

3 Likes

But if we hire them to work from home, they don’t pay a lot of U.S. taxes from India, and then their pay is spent in India instead of here, and then they might eventually compete with us. That makes no sense. If they are that smart, get them over here.

Here is what I propose:

Do what Canada did when my wife tried to move there. They based their decision on human capital criteria. She had 4 business degrees, a U.S. MBA, spoke 6 languages, had tens of thousands in her bank account, was super fit, and had an amazing resume… she went right to the front of the line, walked right in, and was ultimately granted permanent residence. In a real sense, Canada fought for her to come there.

That’s what the U.S. should do instead of letting in broke, uneducated people who are then a financial burden to our society.

3 Likes

This was my guess too. Or does Microsoft just bring in a bunch of foreigners and pay them to vote Democrat.

1 Like

No, it’s that Microsoft wants the smartest software developers they can find in the world. They are brain draining. DEI was made illegal already. InterNACHI’s attorneys made us scrub our site and policies of all DEI stuff last year. It is illegal to do anything in an effort to seek diversity. It’s literally a crime.

That would require a will to prosecute.

It’s more efficient just to revoke the visas

1 Like

With the ban on DEI practices (a ban which I support), my partner’s brother is making bank. He’s an attorney. He scans company websites looking for anything like “We support diversity” or whatever and sues them.

Anyway, if you are opposed to DEI and in favor of hiring based solely on merit, then you should support companies like Microsoft who are trying to hire more Indian developers because they need that talent.

90% of Microsoft’s employees are American citizens and permanent workers with a median employee compensation of $200,972. As a a publicly traded company, its fiduciary duty to shareholders requires it to secure the absolute best global talent to maintain its competitive edge and drive innovation, not to find the cheapest labor.

The current administration’s policy shifts appear less about economic protectionism and more about demographic engineering.

1 Like

I agree. He’s also not thinking it out very far (most politicians don’t).

Where do you see Trump encouraging Microsoft to hire American citizens as demographic engineering? You projected that without evidence.

Who is client? Random persons off the street who claim to be harmed?

There are lawyers that scan Home Inspectors website for ADA issues, a similar scam. The lawyer finds some lacky off the street to file the claim with them.

Even though I am against DEI, I may be more opposed to the these sharks in a suit.

https://forum.nachi.org/t/ada-website-law-suites-10-000/233103/20?u=bcawhern1

1 Like

The policy change doesn’t prevent tech companies from hiring H1B Visa holders, it just prevents them from getting citizenship. It’s a way to preserve the natural stock. Regardless of the pretense, history always has a way of repeating itself.

When you say “natural stock,” do you mean American workers and their economic interests, or do you mean preserving the American population’s current cultural or ethnic background? If it is the latter, how did you reach that conclusion?

Has he scanned Microsoft’s site?

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/diversity/default

1 Like

The policy says that “you can work here, you can live here, but you cannot have citizenship”. It harkens back to 1920’s immigration policies that prevented “guest workers” from getting citizenship to preserve U.S. demographic homogeneity.

High-skilled immigrants expand the economy, drive innovation, and create new employment opportunities that ultimately benefit American workers. And since the administration is simultaneously attacking higher education institutions, where else are these highly skilled workers to come from?

Targeting illegals wasn’t enough. The intentions are obvious.

1 Like

A policy can protect US workers while also affecting other issues. You assume intent.

Policy correction is not an attack. That characterization illustrates an emotional response to policy changes.

What is Trump doing at Universities? He is reversing progressive ideology and demanding accountability in several key areas. Federal funding is a tool to accomplish this. This will bolster and improve our skilled workforce.

Here is a decent outline.

https://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/us-department-of-education-issues-proposed-rule-overhaul-and-improve-americas-higher-education-accreditation-system?utm_source=chatgpt.com

The White House also clearly defines what you consider and attack

Notwithstanding this slide in graduation rates and graduates’ performance in the labor market, the spike in debt obligations in relation to expected earnings, and repayment rates on student loans, accreditors have remained improperly focused on compelling adoption of discriminatory ideology, rather than on student outcomes.

Because of administration policies, Federal funding is being cut-off where it is needed most. U.S.-born tech workers enter the job market with significant financial debt, while competing directly with foreign counterparts whose foundational education was financed under completely different economic systems.

The current administration demands that tech companies look inward, but they make financing an education harder.