Originally Posted By: gbeaumont This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Hi Jeff,
thats why I did not credit it dummy ![icon_lol.gif](upload://zEgbBCXRskkCTwEux7Bi20ZySza.gif) ![icon_lol.gif](upload://zEgbBCXRskkCTwEux7Bi20ZySza.gif) ![icon_lol.gif](upload://zEgbBCXRskkCTwEux7Bi20ZySza.gif)
Originally Posted By: jpope This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
I think panel recognition is a great subject. This one almost slipped by me when I first saw it. There were no other “notable” defects (other than the AL wire).
Originally Posted By: gbeaumont This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
and the picture was courtesy of Jeff Pope (where I steal all my best panel pictures)
The Give away here is the psychedelic colors of the breaker switches, as far as I know zinsco were the only manufacturer to do this, this panel probably dates from the mid 1970's so the breakers were designed to co-ordinate properly with bell bottoms and tank tops.
Originally Posted By: jpope This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
bking wrote:
Is the service entrance wire a defect because it is AL ? If yes why?
No. Stranded AL is typically not a problem.
bking wrote:
Is this a typical Zinsco that should be reported as "need to replace" ?
Yes, however, this is one of the older models (late 50's) with copper bus bars rather than the aluminum bus bars. The breaker connection is poor at best but the oxidation factor is less of a problem on this type.
The breakers have a high failure rate, comparable to FPE, and have a tendancy to freeze up over time.
-- Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
"At JPI, we'll help you look better"
(661) 212-0738