Washington Home Inspectors Poll

General Inspection Topics Legislation, Licensing, Ethics & Legal Issues
121

Call Soumi Wendy, how can you know so much about a subject an have never talked to the source of the problem, Soumi and WSDA’s position, as I explained to you and Dennis Thomas months ago is that you are still in violation with the WAC even if you hire a licensed Sub to do the WDO, like I said back then I don’t agree with Soumi or WSDA and I don’t like being forced to be a Structural Pest Inspector, its the force thing, once again like I have already told you several times this week, call Soumi, you can ask many of the othe NACHI Washington HI’s who have talked to Soumi they get the same thing from him, Soumi even says that Appraisers need a license if the mention conducive conditions.

This time I’m trying to be “polite”, but I don’t believe you really understand what the SPI Involves, your website:

No retraction is needed Wendy, at least not by me, a Structural Pest Inspector doesn’t perform a **TERMITE INSPECTION, **he/she performs a **COMPLETE WOOD DESTROYING ORGANIZM INSPECTION, termites are only part of it, in your are the big thing is Rot.

**Your statement about minimal experience is true in some instances, but I could use the same quote and say Home Inspector instead. You passed the NACHI Test, that’s the Minimal Standard, I and most others, passed the WSDA SPI Exam, another minimal standard correct?
But most of us have continued our education and training in both fields.

Your above statement from your website leaves you hanging way out there in the wind, read the lWAC I posted Wendy, you cannot even mention any thing conducive or pertaining to WDO conditions in your Home Inspection Report without having an SPI license, if a sub were legal, he would have to write up everything that regarded WDO, you couldn’t even mention a leaky drain. That’s not my opinion, that’s what the WAC says and that’s what Soumi says.

It was you and Thomas who started this months ago when you were telling him he didn’t need a license and people had gone to court and proved that, which no one in the WSDA is aware of by the way, then you both attacked me because my marketing informs people of the WDO Requirement and tells them that many Home Inspectors are not licensed and to be sure the one they do hire is Licensed, just like many other websites some of which tell clients to make sure their Inspector is Insured. Because I obey the law, whether or not I like it, you and Thomas chose not to and attack me saying I was trying to run you out of business by telling LIES, of course neither of you have ever called Dr. Soumi and gotten the facts so all you have to offer are your Opinions, call him Wendy, get the facts.

[QUOTE]
Another bald faced lie Lewis.

** It is stated very clearly that you may use another WDO inspector**/QUOTE]

Show me where Wendy! Call Soumi, I’m done, I’ve embarrassed myself enough by arguing with you. Sue, that was funny the first time you said it, now it makes yu look even more rediculous. Someday you might even find out what my wife does for a living, she doesn’t she just shkes her head an say “Is this woman for real” or at least that’s what she said this time.

I’m putting you back on ignore now, if you want to keep arguing your “opinion” do it in the Private messages, SUE, my wife has no sense of humor.

122

Windy

I think you are unqualified as Lewis and others have pointed out. That means you are a liability not only to your practicing colleagues but Nachi collectively.

So much for James and the ESOP. Wendy appears to be a big fraud.

123

Joe F has known about Wendy since one of the members started asking everyone to send her money because of her circumstances.

Bottom line is do what ever you want as there is no enforcement of any rules at NACHI. NACHI is not about following rules it is about being the biggest and having the biggest message board.

124

Thanks for your post unfortunately Wendy gets a little information and becomes an instant expert .
We are having difficulty with None members trying to destroy NACHI on the Canadian section .
Wendy just loves to come there and give her openion and these person’s just love it and use her useless posts to further run down NACHI.
When you try and talk to her she attacks and if you retaliate she gets vindictive.
She could be an asset to NACHI but now she most certainly is a liability and no help .
Roy Cooke . A supporter of NACHI all the way

125

You can say that again! Its about the hits. That is why I am so busy over on the Canadian side keeping the hit counter going. Nick must love me but he never says thanks. :frowning:

126

That is incorrect.

The ESOP Committee does not “police” the message board. Nor do we accept anything published on it as “fact”. Think of the ramifications if even half of the baloney that goes up on this board is accepted at face value.

The ESOP Committee is limited to responding to complaints made by members. In your complaint…not on this stupid message board where everybody’s pee-pee is bigger than the other guy’s pee-pee…you present your facts to support your complaint. The complaint is investigated, accordingly, and the committee makes a recommendation to Nick. It’s that simple.

So, if you have a serious complaint that you would like to see addressed, you should follow the established procedure…much like you are expecting the Washington inspectors to do. File a complaint.

If your intentions are to simply take over this thread with your Canadian-like personal barb thread drift, then we can just consider this thread dead.

127

WDO inspector.

It’s going to be the opposite soon. Inspectors won’t be able to report on conducive conditions and will have to defer to a specialist. Maybe they’ll even find another way to make money off of you and require WDO inspectors to take lots of classes, or charge more for the license, or whatever. No matter what, they’ll find a way to make money off the whole thing and switch it up. Once you buy into the system, you are at it’s mercy.

128

James

Do you have a problem with Canadians? You seem to have a lot of misguided views I have noticed. If you not sure of what you speak of please don’t reply with more bull. If you and your ESOP group were serious about protocol and ethics you would ensure this board has stringent rules that would ensure people cannot post under false names. Unfortunately the rules are bent and broken to ensure maximum hits to ensure the ratings are kept up on Google.

129

[quote=lcapaul]
Call Soumi Wendy, how can you know so much about a subject an have never talked to the source of the problem, Soumi and WSDA’s position, as I explained to you and Dennis Thomas months ago is that you are still in violation with the WAC even if you hire a licensed Sub to do the WDO, like I said back then I don’t agree with Soumi or WSDA and I don’t like being forced to be a Structural Pest Inspector, its the force thing, once again like I have already told you several times this week, call Soumi, you can ask many of the othe NACHI Washington HI’s who have talked to Soumi they get the same thing from him, Soumi even says that Appraisers need a license if the mention conducive conditions.

This time I’m trying to be “polite”, but I don’t believe you really understand what the SPI Involves, your website:

No retraction is needed Wendy, at least not by me, a Structural Pest Inspector doesn’t perform a **TERMITE INSPECTION, **he/she performs a **COMPLETE WOOD DESTROYING ORGANIZM INSPECTION, termites are only part of it, in your are the big thing is Rot.

**Your statement about minimal experience is true in some instances, but I could use the same quote and say Home Inspector instead. You passed the NACHI Test, that’s the Minimal Standard, I and most others, passed the WSDA SPI Exam, another minimal standard correct?
But most of us have continued our education and training in both fields.

Your above statement from your website leaves you hanging way out there in the wind, read the lWAC I posted Wendy, you cannot even mention any thing conducive or pertaining to WDO conditions in your Home Inspection Report without having an SPI license, if a sub were legal, he would have to write up everything that regarded WDO, you couldn’t even mention a leaky drain. That’s not my opinion, that’s what the WAC says and that’s what Soumi says.

It was you and Thomas who started this months ago when you were telling him he didn’t need a license and people had gone to court and proved that, which no one in the WSDA is aware of by the way, then you both attacked me because my marketing informs people of the WDO Requirement and tells them that many Home Inspectors are not licensed and to be sure the one they do hire is Licensed, just like many other websites some of which tell clients to make sure their Inspector is Insured. Because I obey the law, whether or not I like it, you and Thomas chose not to and attack me saying I was trying to run you out of business by telling LIES, of course neither of you have ever called Dr. Soumi and gotten the facts so all you have to offer are your Opinions, call him Wendy, get the facts.

I know what your wife does for a living and I’m not at all threatened by a woman who would marry you.:roll:

Lewis. You are the one who continues to show your lack of character, your ignorance, and your willingness to lie to continue to try to “prove” your point.
YOU need to get rid of your hard on for me and get over yourself.
Like James said. File the complaint. If you think that it can be proven that I’ve done anything wrong.
Like a famous man once said. **** or get off the pot. Leave the rest of us alone if you can’t get it to go down.

130

Soumi can have his opinion till the cows come home of what the interpretation of the law is. Until I see him actually win on appeal in ANY case (feel free to post it), I will continue to go by the only interpretation that matters. The one that holds up in court.

131

Ray…my knock refers to the fruitless and endless exchange of stooge dialogue between you and make believe people in the Canadian threads.

The ESOP does not monitor or control who has access to the message board. Take that up with Chris M.

132

Wendy

Your ignorance is overwhelming as usual. I think you are in contravention of your state laws. Considering your not qualified to inspect I suspect you cannot make an informed decision or digest what is being told to you very succintly because you are not experienced. You only see the short comings from your myopic perch.

133

YOU THINK?:shock:

Oh my gosh, you guys seriously amaze me. YOU don’t know ****. You have NO CLUE as to what training I have, what I don’t have, what I am doing and not doing.

For God’s sake, I could be sitting on the toilet for months at a time and you morons would still claim that I was breaking the law.

YOU Raymond E. Wand and LEWIS CAPAUL, must have a HELLUVA lot of time on your HANDS to spend so much of it bitching about me.
LEWIS CAPAUL claims to have put me on ignore, and then manages to find something to respond to anyway. :roll:

I have grown extremely tired of the BULL****.

134

NO DUH LEWIS!

What do you think a consumer is going to recognize and understand more and more rapidly?
WDO Inspection, Wood Destroying Organism Inspection, OR Termite Inspection? HMMMMM?

You are the clueless idiot LEWIS. YOU can’t see outside of that stupid little box you are stuck in. YOU are so busy sticking your head up your ***, that you don’t realize that you can’t make something true just by repeating it over and over. This is a tactic of abusive men. Which you are.

**

135

Greg? Don’t you have alot of work to do making money off of your fellow inspectors. You know? It must be exausting to do a complete 180 from denouncing inspectors who become vendors and claiming that you are going to take your buying power elsewhere and avoid them because they had the nerve to sell to fellow inspectors. :roll:

Nothing like being a hypocrite to give you a good workout first thing in the morning.

You know, you can have someone blatantly asking for money and handouts from their fellow inspectors (or not) which is very open and honest.

Or, you can come up with a scheme MEANT to look like it is something helpful and something that your fellow inspectors NEED, and then make them believe your bull**** enough that they PAY you for this product and PAY you to do training classes and all.

Which one is taking advantage of their fellow inspectors?

Both you say? Well, you would be right now wouldn’t you? One of them is just being open and honest, and not hypocritical, and the other one (guess) is being a complete snake in the grass hypocrite, hiding most of the time and only coming out to strike every once in awhile.

136

**
Charge people to be listed in a directory for a service that isn’t even available in the states they are living in! Make sure you charge them alot of money so that by the time they figure out they’ve been had, you will have made it worth screwing your “brothers and sisters” over and you can work on the next scheme while they cool down and forget what an *** you were.

**

137

Greg

I don’t think Wendy likes you. Oh oh thats funny considering she is what appears to be, and that is a home fluffer. Her website is a big fraud and its unfortunate NACHI has lended credence to a fraud artist.

138

Do you really enjoy slandering people Raymond? Home fluffer? Geeze. We haven’t even had beds to sleep on this year. LOL. Real fluffy.

Because you have no idea what you are talking about.

Why don’t you go make your MUPPET inspectors talk to each other some more.

Dave.

139

:roll::roll::roll::roll:

140

Lewis & Wendy… How does that “filter” thing work? After reading what I thought might be an informative post on proposed legislation, I am left wishing I had a filter for all the grade school antics I had to wade through.
It is no wonder that people, like Gerry D, who sit on the advisory panel, on their own time, do not spend alot of time on these boards. There is not alot of value in nearly the entire post for them to even consider as a valuable. Maybe one page of relevant information, and 9 pages of the Wendy and Lewis drama…It is a good thing serious legislative decisions aren’t made on a forum like this…