I think you were on the right tract initially.
I would only add that if you were amending a report.
Sounds about right if you are sure there was no pier cap. I would also note the implications and your recommendations.
For example you could recommend that it be verified that the cells of the blocks are filled in (pier cap) and that the beam is not resting directly on the masonry for better beam bearing and resistance to termite or moisture damage of the beam. And if you are in a higher seismic risk area I would also note that the top block is not mortared to the block below, and there doesn’t appear to be tie-downs.
I wouldn’t say anything about the pier orientation, or possible sagging or settlement (unless you observed that, like a cracked lower block) … period. Stick to what you can observe and issues from known problems based on industry standards and references. I am not aware of any residential code or home inspection industry standard reference that would support that position. If you scare off the potential buyer, and the owner gets pissed and brings in a specialist you could be in a world of hurt.