Don’t care if it passed code. If it doesn’t perform or if it is going to cause future problems including possible structural then it should be written up. The siding in question should have clearance as per manufacturer and YES it probably will make the warranty void especially if it starts staining and or showing signs of efflorescence.
What about the unprimed non manufactured cuts on james hardie products? I see them ALL the time, did that pass code? Sure it did BUT it will void the warranty. Don’t you think you should tell your clients about a probable warranty exclusion?
OK, one last reply to this post. I’m not disputing what you all are saying. In most cases, I would say the same thing. What I am saying is; with years of experience in that specific trade, from what I can see in the picture, the home owner will never have a problem. That’s what separates the average home inspector from the home inspector with years of hands on experience. I don’t ring false alarms. See you on the next post.
I know I’m a little late on this thread, but…
Your answer is it’s nobody’s fault?? That’s a contractor’s answer…
Sure it is. Every single one of them compounded the problem. Each one further along the line is more to blame than the previous until the “builder” is informed. Then it’s 100% his fault. Your builder doesn’t typically build the house, he coordinates the trades. It’s that person’s responsibility at the end of the day. Sticking homebuyers with delayed problems should be a punishable crime. No joke.
I had an identical situation on a covered porch. Cost to do it correctly the first time: exactly $30. Cost for me to repair the problem: $3,865.11