I’d be laughing too. 
She laughs because she is insecure.
Disgruntled for Trump employees is not exactly a stellar reference. Resentment causes people to distort and misrepresent all sorts of things (mostly their role in the resentment).
Agreed…But she should relax. The same uni-party deep state puppeteers will keep things afloat just like they are doing for Biden. All the sides are greased, all the pockets are lined, and war is just around the corner to cover it all up
I gave up my membership in the “He man woman haters club” many many years ago, I’m surprised to see you guys are still acting like dues paying members.
Never knew there was such a thing. Glad you gave it up. Insecure laughter is a human characteristic, only you think it has something to do only with women. Very odd! . . . are you sure you gave up your membership? or is this just another female victimhood thing?
Do you consider her nervous laughter a feminine trait? I have not considered that. That is quite sexist of you.
Are we back to not being able to criticize a woman or a minority?
Wow!
I refuse to be lectured by a party that allowed a nominee to be inserted to the top of the ticket. They did it subversively against Bernie to help Hillary, and now they do it in the open. Not only that, Hillary used Russian misinformation and lies directly against Trump with the full cooperation of the FBI to affect the outcome of the election.
No one has ever owned up to it. The opposite has happened. Screw that.
Crown Trump and the Dems will never pull the ole nominee switch-a-roo ever again. He has the blessing from the majority court to weaponize the DOJ against the Democrats as an official duty of his monarchy.
In the name of democracy… 
Harris says she is trying to get a second debate with Trump
Trump last week said he would not participate in another debate against Harris before the Nov. 5 election.
“THERE WILL BE NO THIRD DEBATE!” the former president wrote on his social media site Truth Social. Trump debated President Joe Biden in June before his matchup against Harris.
At their debate, Harris put Trump on the defensive with a stream of attacks on his fitness for office, his support of abortion restrictions and his myriad legal woes.
So it was justifiable to install Harris in this manner?
The way majority rule works is that someone has to make the decisive decisions… The Leadership of The Democratic Party can do whatever they want and if enough of their members disagree they are free to leave without any further obligation, no? 
Isn’t that your and your cohorts same argument for abolishing the Electoral College?
It’s a tired argument. The Democratic Party can nominate whomever they want to. There is no law or constitutional precedent preventing them from doing so.
If I created a new political party, called it the Cocktail Party, nominated and placed myself on the ballot, would you be as upset?
I think you’re really just concerned that Harris has a better shot at beating Trump than Biden did.
What else do you need to know???