Originally Posted By: Robert Wade This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Depending on the design of the truss either the upper chord or the lower chord will rest on the foundation. If the upper chord rests on the foundation then the lower chord will be in tension and the upper chord in bending. If the lower chord is resting on the foundation then the upper chord is in compression and the lower chord in bending.
But, then, we aren't structural engineers.
Yes, it does look as though the lower chord was cut. But it is possible that it was designed that way. You don't know unless you can get your hands on the truss company calculations.
But the lack of bearing at one end is a serious problem. Either the truss was too short, the sills incorrectly placed, or the foundation too wide.
Originally Posted By: jpope This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
bemelander wrote:
My report to the client will be that trusses appear to have been modified in the field. Recommend further inspection from a qualified structural engineer.
Do you agree.
Bill
Yes. I agree.
-- Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
"At JPI, we'll help you look better"
(661) 212-0738
Originally Posted By: bemelander This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Tim,
No this is a 2800 sq ft home.
All,
Thanks for the replies. I did check further, talked to a SE, he agree that is needs further evaluation. He suggested first the truss manufacture. I did reply to my client with this information and it looks like he may pass on this home. He’s a city boy from down state and is looking for a retirement home in the country with little work.
Originally Posted By: ccoombs This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
I think you made the correct call for a PE. My concern is with the lack of support on the vertical bearing member. It wouldn’t take much to kick it out.
