Multi Inspector Firm Vs Single Inspector Firm

1

Hello Ladies and Gentleman,

Multi-inspector firms and privately owned inspection companies seem to differ significantly in financial dynamics. Multi-inspector firms have the capacity to generate higher revenues due to the ability to handle more inspections simultaneously, so these firms can serve a larger client base and handle volume work, such as contracts with real estate agencies and insurance companies (which I think is a suspect). This scalability comes with increased operational costs, including salaries, benefits, training, and office expenses.

On the other hand, a privately owned, single-inspector business usually has lower overhead, as it avoids employee-related costs and often operates from a home office. This setup keeps profit margins higher per inspection, even if total revenue is lower. However, the solo model is limited by the owner’s capacity, so income is tied directly to the owner’s time and ability to acquire business.

I have already spoken with several of these companies. It seems like the inspectors that are employed by multi-inspector firms are accepting considerably less income per-inspection, about 50% - 60%.

Of course they can make up the difference by adding additional inspections, probably not the path most of us would want to take.

I do not disagree with the business model, it’s standard, volume… volume… volume, but for the employee I can only see a few reasons why you would want to work for a multi-inspector firm.

As I mentioned, I have spoken with several of these companies. My reasons were simple: acquire knowledge, learn from more experienced people, work within a company as opposed to running one.

That was until I realized that every single multi-inspector firm wants you to sign a non-compete agreement. A very one sided non-compete agreement. Non-compete agreements are fine and a legitimate way of protecting intellectual property. I just don’t see how that applies to this particular situation.

Just curious how other inspectors feel about the pros and cons of multi-inspector firms vs single-inspector firms.

Enjoy The Day,

Matt

2

First check your State laws regarding non-compete agreements. There may be stipulations that make then unenforceable. For example here in Texas if the non-compete would prevent you from practicing your profession (you can’t work you can’t eat!) and (in the case of home inspections) the position did not require highly specialized abilities, then the non-compete would not be enforceable. So review your State laws before you decide not to enter into one. The firm can have you sign one but it may not be legally binding.

For your last question about pros and cons are you asking about owning one or working for one?

3

To expand on Manny’s question…
What is your motivation for entering the Building Inspection Industry (at all)?

1 Like
4

Hi Emmanuel,
Yes, what would you consider the benefits, and or draw-backs, as an employee of a multi inspector firm.

5

Jeffrey,
My motivation is simple. I have owned several construction companies in several different states, I enjoy working within the construction and building industries and have done so for the last 25 years. I also have some experience in the engineer field, which is a problem recognition and solving field similar to the home inspection industry, and it’s fun!. Was it just curiosity that motivated your question? the “(at all)?” has me confused.

6

You pointed out hypotheticals and metrics between single and multi home inspection firms.
Start out opening an inspection company and see where the road leads you.
Remember, …you have to attract clients, and employs if you go the multi inspector route.

7

Starting and operating a business is hard work. Running and operating a multi-firm is like any other business, hard work. Do you have a preference? How is your company set-up? The post is geared more to what all of my colleagues on this forum are doing. Just interested in your views. I’m not sure I have a complete view yet.
Thanks.