David,
I take back what I said about you befor. You have now posted something useful.
After reading the thread I feel confident that the PHIC judgement is false or invalid. While I have doubts about Nick's ability to not bend the truth, I have no doubt that if any proff of serving existed PHIC would have provided that proof for all to see. As they did not there is no reason to believe it exists.
valued quote from James Bushart
"An association of members will stick together and be there for each other, whether they are directly affected or not."
valued quote from James Bushart
"An association of members will stick together and be there for each other, whether they are directly affected or not."
Originally Posted By: dnice This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
rzimmerman1 wrote:
Erby,
I did search and continued to come up empty.
Thanks to David I was provided info and help...
That was what appeared to be the most appropriate thread that came up on a search of the term "default AND judgement" The key thing that narrowed it down was the word "default", which would be hard to know to look for unless someone told you that little detail about the alleged judgement.
Some of the contents of that thread detail an issue that is a little more complex than one would think, based on what some have said. That is why I often say that things are not always as they appear.
Originally Posted By: ecrofutt This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
are looking for in just a few minutes, but you continue to come up empty? If you read his link you’ll see that he just simply searched for the term “default judgement”. The words that are highlighted in orange, when you click on the thread.
I repeat: Only you will recognize what gold you are looking for.
I can search all day long for what I want to find. But, only I know what that is when I find it.
Sometimes, you have to read the whole "mass of threads" to find what you are looking for.
You have to do your own research. Don't expect me to do it for you.
I hope you understand the difference.
Just don't search for the term "deleted". You REALLY don't want to go there!!
Originally Posted By: apightling This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Erby . . . thanks for the information. I hope that Mr. Z. will benefit from it. I went back and researched his previous posts and he truly needs solid information rather than inuendo and “unresearched” repetition. Mr. Z. probably thinks obfuscating and bending the truth is somehow noble if ‘but his cause be just’. . . .
Originally Posted By: apightling This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Yep, you are right. There’s a wealth of information in the archives. . . . and on the net. . . . particularly relating to the topics Mr. Z was talking about. If his comment was reinforced with links to those his extrapolations and conclusions would be much more easily understood and more likely accepted.
My point, however, is that regardless of the topic or which side you are on, you can lay out the truth to substantiate your comments if, as you correctly point out, you do your homework. Employing tactics such as inuendo and implication doesn't provide any substance except to those who are easily duped. There doesn't appear to be many on this board.
Otherwise, it's an opinion, and everybody has one. This is mine.
I have had enough fun with this line of conversation . . . back to earning a living.
Originally Posted By: jmichalski This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Joe, I sense this is a source of frustration for you, but I am not sure why.
Granted, I do not have an extensive realtor network, but I have never-not once - been asked about PHIC or encountered the attitude that NACHI was non-compliant.
Without jurisdiction or enforcement power- in fact, without any recognized form of authority at all - PHIC has no standing to submit questionnaires or issue any kind of statement that extends beyond an opinion.