mlarson
(Michael Larson, WI Lic. # 1672-106)
August 15, 2013, 11:59am
81
nthornberry:
I don’t have to release Joe from ****. His whole angle their should be more than enough to show everyone he’s unqualified to be involved in anything involving contracts, rules, or pretty much anything requiring analytical thought.
Prove me wrong- show me what rule he is going by here.
But Nathan it is you who demanded over and over they be posted.
You even said you would on the 22nd. Was that another lie?
Joe’s release request seems extremely reasonable in light of your threatening behavior here and in private.
What are you hiding Nathan?
kleonard
(Kevin Leonard, CPI/CMI)
August 15, 2013, 12:02pm
82
nthornberry:
I don’t have to release Joe from ****. His whole angle their should be more than enough to show everyone he’s unqualified to be involved in anything involving contracts, rules, or pretty much anything requiring analytical thought.
Prove me wrong- show me what rule he is going by here.
Listen up blow hard,
Joe has agreed to let the truth be displayed for everyone here to see as long as YOU agree to nullifying the threats YOU made against him concerning those emails. This is about THOSE EMAILS & NOTHING ELSE - GET IT?
By your consistent ducking & your deceptive game playing, you make it apparent you have something to hide .
mlarson
(Michael Larson, WI Lic. # 1672-106)
August 15, 2013, 12:10pm
84
nthornberry:
Huh? You don’t make sense. I don’t need to nullify anything, **nor am I going to. **
You get confused very easily Kevin. I hope that doesn’t reflect on your home inspection capabilities.
There you have it folks.
Nathan has no intention of posting the email exchange on the 22nd when he is “back in the office”.
The truth is not in him.
kleonard
(Kevin Leonard, CPI/CMI)
August 15, 2013, 12:12pm
85
nthornberry:
Huh? You don’t make sense. I don’t need to nullify anything, nor am I going to.
You get confused very easily Kevin. I hope that doesn’t reflect on your home inspection capabilities.
By your consistent ducking & your deceptive game playing, you make it apparent you have something to hide.
mlarson
(Michael Larson, WI Lic. # 1672-106)
August 15, 2013, 12:31pm
89
mlarson
(Michael Larson, WI Lic. # 1672-106)
August 15, 2013, 1:01pm
91
You have to actually read them to find out.
**P. Nathan Thornberrry is a serial liar.
I’m damn good at searching BTW.
Takes almost no time at all.
**
canderson5
(Cameron Anderson)
August 15, 2013, 1:46pm
92
But the threats were based on if Joe released the emails, as Joe himself stated. So no waiver is needed if Nate releases them, which he should.
mlarson
(Michael Larson, WI Lic. # 1672-106)
August 15, 2013, 1:51pm
93
Unless both parties agree no release can or should be made.
Simple stuff for most to understand.
kleonard
(Kevin Leonard, CPI/CMI)
August 15, 2013, 2:10pm
94
Yes, but if Nathan rescinds his threats against Joe, the emails could be posted today. Then we could put this issue to rest now rather than later.
Based on Nathans ducking the issue & diversionary tactics he’s attempted lately, I have my doubts that he will keep his word.
jfarsetta
(Joe Farsetta)
August 15, 2013, 3:05pm
95
Nate can post them himself.
Once he does, he does so under the condition that he has granted the waiver, as he would have published them. This is the exchange in its entirety, not snippets.
As of this date, several days after the fact, Nathan seemingly ducks the issue.
He stated something about two days. Two days have passed. Then he mentions the 22nd.
I welcome his release of, and posting of the e-mail exchange. Unless and until he grants the waiver/hold harmless, which is DIRECTLY related to the threat of lawsuit indicated in the e-mails, I will not be the one posting them.
Nathan can clear all of this up at any time.
canderson5
(Cameron Anderson)
August 15, 2013, 3:36pm
96
Well now you’re just making up pure fantasy.
jfarsetta
(Joe Farsetta)
August 15, 2013, 3:52pm
97
Cam,
You may be right, but Nate’s seeming refusal to grant me the waiver or post them himself means that we will never know.
canderson5
(Cameron Anderson)
August 15, 2013, 11:08pm
99
I think it’s a little early to make that prediction. He’ll either do it or he won’t. Wouldn’t him requesting their release earlier this year effectively be a waiver anyway?
jkeilson
(James Keilson, CMI, Certified Master Inspector)
August 16, 2013, 12:25am
100
Do the old timers here remember the elderly lady?
Where’s the Beef ?
The new younger guys of today will have,
Where’s the emails ?:shock:
Jim
(http://www.trustyourinspector.org/ )