Another image added to the free Gallery: Sidewall Flashing

[quote="Nick Gromicko, CMI, post:20, topic:240373, full:true, username:gromicko”]
[quote="lkage, post:18, topic:240373”]
The image simply isn’t clear.
[/quote]

It’s not angled up the sidewall. Look at the building wrap. Building wrap is installed horizontally and the image shows it parallel to the counter flashing and flashing, which means the roof/sidewall intersection, counter flashing, and flashing are also all horizontal.
[/quote]

So, the image is supposed to portray a “headwall” not a “sidewll?

Maybe that is why it is not clear.

1 Like

I think so, don’t you? How could it be drawn better?

I think you are correct that it should be labeled headwall, not sidewall if you look at “most” definitions that I’m finding.

Either that or we need a wider view illustrated as angle from perspective and actual angle are indistinguishable in a 2 dimensional drawing.

[quote="Nick Gromicko, CMI, post:22, topic:240373, full:true, username:gromicko”]
I think so, don’t you? How could it be drawn better?
[/quote]

First, call it a “headwall” flashing…not a “sidewall” flashing.

Second, remove the kickout flashing from the “headwall” flashing image.

3 Likes

I agree with the wording change.

But is there never a kickout on headwall flashing?

[quote="Nick Gromicko, CMI, post:26, topic:240373, username:gromicko”]
I agree with the wording change.

But is there never a kickout on headwall flashing?
[/quote]

How could it work on a horizontal/level junction?

There is no water running in that direction.

3 Likes

OK. I’m going to have the artist change the word "sidewall to headwal"l and remove the kickout.

Thanks Larry!!! You were super helpful.

3 Likes

That’s what I was getting at Larry

@gromicko The 2nd & 3rd images I posted above are from the NACHI Library. They both show headwall flashing with a roof that is sloped away from the wall. I just spent some time looking for an architectural detail depicting what is in your OP, however the only thing I could find that was even close was a graphic for a flat roof on a parapet wall. Even those show a cant strip to get the water to flow away from the wall. This is from the Nachi library:

And from the CCPIA

If a cant strip is not used and the roof is flat then this type of flashing would do the same thing as a cant strip:

I’ve never seen it. If there is a sloped roof at the end of the head wall, like that of a dormer for example, the step flashing on the side wall would extend past the end of the headwall flashing like this picture from one of my inspections (not the greatest picture, but the first one I could easily find):

Now if a roof ends on an exterior wall, the headwall flashing “should” extend past the fascia board slightly, however, again the roof slopes away from the wall, so a kickout in this location would be pointless. Here is another on of mine, warranty inspection (edited for this post), I called this out as a problem because the fascia had slight signs of water damage, even though the roof sloped away from the wall, because the flashing above it did not extend past, and the siding was not cut properly for the flashing.

If it were a metal roof, then solid flashing would be ok BUT the roof would still have to be sloped in some way. Water has to go somewhere…

Yes!
Perhaps this diagram could be repeated left and right (a double diagram), the left side for membrane systems (as pictured) and the right side for shingles or tile.

Metal is similar to membrane.

With Larry’s help, we got it. As I noticed the house wrap in the image is running parallel to the flashing, thus the flashing has to be horizontal (It’s often hard to distinguish an angle from perspective with an actual angle in a 2-dimensional drawing). That established, Larry correctly points out that we can drop the kickback and that it is not a sidewall, but a headwall, and to change the text to headwall. He’s right.

Artist is correcting.

WTG Larry !!

1 Like

Based on previous notes, we’re trying to depict Sidewall vs. Headwall Flashing. We’ve revised the image noted above and created a new one. Any thoughts? We don’t need to overcomplicate. Our goal is to show components and water flow.

Looks like that was done…good job. :ok_hand:

1 Like

I would make a change to the SIDEWALL image and make the wall and building wrap horizontal. Building wrap does not run parallel to the angled flashing on a sidewall. It runs horizontal.

Here, I drew a PIC:

1 Like

Yeah, that looks good Nick. And I still think some step flashing is important there depending on actual roof covering material.

I looked at the headwall flashing change but not the sidewll change.

Nick’s drawing depicted the sidewall concept better than the graphic. The drawing shows the roof slope ad it coincides with the water flow.

The flashing should be step flashing if shingles are used as a roof covering however.

Since most homes are shingles, I would just change the SIDEWALL flashing to step.

This is an image created for a commercial use. Would it be okay if we labeled: Flashing (Step or “L” depending on the roof materials)? Many commercial buildings will not have shingles.

[quote="Larry Kage, CMI, post:36, topic:240373, username:lkage”]
And I still think some step flashing is important there depending on actual roof covering material.
[/quote]

[quote="Michael Durante, post:37, topic:240373, username:mdurante”]
The flashing should be step flashing if shingles are used as a roof covering however.
[/quote]

That’s what I was thinking.