Remember that when your AI program mentions NEC in your report. The client may ask you “What does NEC stand for”?
The AI answer is too wordy. A client reading a full report of these long narratives will quickly be glazed over. I would refine the narrative to…
Rear exterior receptacle lacked GFCI (Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter) protection and a proper outdoor weather cover. This condition poses a safety concern. Consult with a qualified electrical contractor to make repairs.
I have played around with it and so far its ability to write a paragraph about any subject is impressive. However it lacks the ability to incorporate all the visual information gathered during the inspection. For example its reply to a missing GFIC was technically correct, but an experienced inspector incorporates the age of the structure, overall condition of the structure, skill level of the buyer through conversations during the inspection, etc. If the house was built in 1950 I would write up the need for GFIC as a safety upgrade.
When you realize it wasn’t just a lesson in grammar, you can/will appreciate Bert’s response.
Ooops, Butthurt time!
I just want to comment quickly that ChatGPT is great for simplifying and clarifying grammar.
If you have a narrative, you can run it through ChatGPT and fix any grammar, punctuation or clarity issues as long as it doesn’t fundamentally alter the point of the narrative.
This will make it more human readable.
What you cannot do is expect it to be correct about the minutia of the inspection business in general or IRC/NEC and other code books in specific.