So I woke up this morning to a 3 star review from a client. This is what it says:
I had Pete come out and do my home inpection. While there was very good communication of issues, some were missed out. For example, the report had one window with broken seal, but after i moved in, i can easily spot about 5. Also, the report had no issues with the sprinkler system, but i spotted few of the heads not working later.
A little backstory:
The home was occupied during inspection, so furniture and stored items inhibit the inspection.
Did you comment about this in the report and advise that issues can be missed as a result? While on site did you collect sufficient pictures for your records to demonstrate this in the event the question did arise later?
The clients were foreign and it was obvious by their demeanor that they had particular expectations.
Everyone has expectations regardless if they are “foreign” to the US or not. Part of our job is to manage these expectations through pre-inspection communications, communications during the inspection, as well as communications after the inspection which includes the report. Notice the key word “communications” used throughout this answer.
They were at the inspection and left before I was able to review.
A detailed and well worded report eliminates the need for an on site briefing.
The only obvious blown seal was in a master bedroom closet window, which I noted. Several “important” deficiencies where noted in the report.
“Several “important” deficiencies” noted in the report is not a replacement for properly reporting all deficiencies at the site that were reasonably expected to be found. That is one expectations of consumers that they are not paying for just finding and reporting “Several “important” deficiencies”.
My comment about the window read “One or more of the windows appear to have a blown seal (foggy or moisture present between glass panes). See Master Bedroom Closet as example.”
Too many Inspectors rely on the “one or more” phrase to cover themselves when they miss the 50 other “mores” that were expensive repairs the buyer was not intending to deal with. Some Inspectors find one example of a condition and then stop looking for any other with the intention of reporting it as “one or more”. It is an obvious time saver for the Inspector but a large disservice to the consumer to take that approach. Hopefully you are not one of those Inspectors?
I ran the sprinkler system and saw no obvious leaks or inoperable heads.
This is my perspective:
Blown seals are hard to spot depending on atmospheric conditions, how long the seal has been blown, how foggy the window appears.
Do you have a phrase for your report explaining this when you do find even one possible broken seal? Evidence of broken seals can disappear and reappear depending on conditions and buyers need to know that if there are broken seals that others can possibly display themselves later.
The home was occupied so it’s not always easy to see or access all the windows.
In addition to the above regarding this view the SOP Subsection 535.227 (a)(1), 535.227 (b)(5).
I pride myself on taking my time and doing a thorough inspection.
I don’t believe I missed 5 blown seals. Not on my worst day. I believe this was an emotional review and the client wanted to emphasize that something was missed.
Possibly the management of the client’s expectations were missed? Possibly your report wording is not sufficient to explain what you are saying here?
As far as sprinklers go, I don’t charge extra for them and no condition is guaranteed after the inspection. Could I have missed an inoperable head, yes, but how big of a deal is that really?
Whether you charge extra for them or not does not matter nor would it excuse missing an important detail if this in fact was missed and not damaged after the inspection. Even though the bare minimum TREC SOP considers this an “optional” inspected item you chose to take on the responsibility and must treat this the same as any required item! As for how big of a deal it is would depend on why they were not working. Even something as simple as clogged heads can cost a homeowner a few hundred dollars after bringing in an irrigation specialist (don’t forget their time and anything else they find while on site). Many homeowners do not understand how easy it is to repair a simple head issue or do not feel they have the ability to do it. To them it can be a “big deal”!
My question to the forum is, How would you handle this situation?
I know I will get some snarkyness about this and that. I don’t take offense easily, just keep it to a minimum so I can get some constructive feedback please.