rhensel
(Russell Hensel)
March 21, 2012, 10:38am
41
It all will be forwarded and the point you brought up are very valid. All the documents sent forward are not association driven.
But the best thing is that they were written and gone over by many people and it takes the members here to make a difference. I appreciate the time, effort and input. I am sure those who wrote it will scratch their heads and wonder how those mistakes got in.
I will keep you informed and to what happens with the board and everyone’s ideas.
evandeven
(Eric Van De Ven, CMI)
March 21, 2012, 10:51am
42
Now there is something I can agree with you on 100%!
Everyone will just have to find ways to work within the SoP.
As I said earlier, and feel free to run it by any attorney, there are plenty of “outs”.
I made that mistake once about 15 years ago. Never again. The shut off valve broke and I paid to have it replaced. If the home is not in a condition to be inspected properly, I tell everyone, when it is, call me.
I believe that is also addressed somewhere in the new SoP.
I was right, it was five instances. Two dishwashers, two washing machines and one Jacuzzi tub. Note: Never leave a tub running, especially when the client wants to “show you something”!
evandeven
(Eric Van De Ven, CMI)
March 21, 2012, 6:15pm
43
wchandler:
I would like to commend the committee for two distinct and most specific actions in the SOP :
No WDO, mold, pest, pollutant, etc. guarantee.
I’m not sure how many inspectors realize just how important this is to preventing a nuisance lawsuit - you should be VERY GRATEFUL. According to my atty, this is huge.
Here is the answer to the above:
482.226 Wood-destroying organism inspection report; notice of inspection or treatment; financial responsibility.—
(1) When an inspection for wood-destroying organisms is made by a licensee for purposes of a real estate transaction and either a fee is charged for the inspection or a written report is requested by the customer, a wood-destroying organism inspection report shall be provided by the licensee or its representative qualified under this chapter to perform such inspections. The inspection shall be made in accordance with good industry practice and standards as established by rule and must include inspection for all wood-destroying organisms. The inspection findings shall be reported to the person requesting the inspection. The report must be made on a form prescribed by the department and furnished by the licensee. A copy of the inspection report shall be retained by the licensee for a period of not less than 3 years.
(2)(a) The inspection report must include the following information and statements:
1. The licensee’s name.
2. The date of the inspection.
3. The address of the structure inspected.
4. Any visible accessible areas not inspected and the reasons for not inspecting them.
5. The areas of the structure that were inaccessible.
6. Any visible evidence of previous treatments for, or infestations of, wood-destroying organisms.
7. The identity of any wood-destroying organisms present and any visible damage caused.
8. A statement that a notice of the inspection has been affixed to the property in accordance with subsection (4) or subsection (5) and a statement of the location of the notice.
(b) If any pest control treatment is provided at the time of the inspection, the inspection report must also provide the name of each of the wood-destroying organisms for which treatment was provided, the name of the pesticide used, and all conditions and terms associated with that treatment.
(c) An inspection report does not constitute a guarantee of the absence of wood-destroying organisms or damage therefrom or other evidence unless the report specifically states therein the extent of such guarantee.
(d) The inspection report must also include a statement certifying that neither the inspector nor the licensee by whom the inspection is made has any financial interest in the property inspected or is associated in any way in the transaction with any party to the transaction other than for inspection purposes.
(3) If periodic reinspections or retreatments are specified in wood-destroying organisms preventive or control contracts, the licensee shall furnish the property owner or the property owner’s authorized agent, after each such reinspection or retreatment, a signed report indicating the presence or absence of wood-destroying organisms covered by the contract, whether retreatment was made, and the common or brand name of the pesticide used. Such report need not be on a form prescribed by the department. A person may not perform periodic reinspections or retreatments unless she or he has an identification card issued under s. 482.091(9).
(4) When a wood-destroying organism inspection is provided in accordance with subsection (1), the licensee shall post notice of such inspection immediately adjacent to the access to the attic or crawl area or other readily accessible area of the property inspected. This notice must be at least 3 inches by 5 inches in size and must consist of a material that will last at least 3 years. It is a violation of this chapter for anyone other than the property owner to remove such notice at any time. The licensee’s name and address and the date of inspection must be stated on the notice.
(5) In addition to the notice required by subsection (4), any licensee who performs control of any wood-destroying organism shall post notice of such treatment immediately adjacent to the access to the attic or crawl area or other readily accessible area of the property treated. This notice must be at least 3 inches by 5 inches in size and must consist of a material that will last at least 3 years. It is a violation of this chapter for anyone other than the property owner to remove such notice at any time. The licensee’s name and address, the date of treatment, the name of the pesticide used, and the wood-destroying organism for which treatment was performed must be stated on the notice. The contract for treatment between the licensee and the consumer must state the location of such notice.
(6) Any licensee that performs wood-destroying organism inspections in accordance with subsection (1) must meet minimum financial responsibility in the form of errors and omissions (professional liability) insurance coverage or bond in an amount no less than $500,000 in the aggregate and $250,000 per occurrence, or demonstrate that the licensee has equity or net worth of no less than $500,000 as determined by generally accepted accounting principles substantiated by a certified public accountant’s review or certified audit. The licensee must show proof of meeting this requirement at the time of license application or renewal thereof.
History.—s. 18, ch. 78-292; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 12, 14, 15, ch. 82-229; s. 98, ch. 83-218; s. 1, ch. 85-335; s. 16, ch. 89-180; ss. 51, 59, ch. 92-203; s. 436, ch. 97-103; s. 6, ch. 2011-192; s. 12, ch. 2011-206.
You cannot be held responsible for anything to do with an inspection you are not licensed to perform.
tmiller2
(Todd A. Miller, HI959 CMI)
March 21, 2012, 8:32pm
44
Ok from left field here but if this is adopted, what does that do to 4 point inspections? They certainly will not be IAW the SOP due to the brevity of the inspection. Do they go away?
JUst found the other thread regarding this but the conclusion is not clear. Does the Fl SOP make 4 point ilegal as it does not or will not fit in the definition of an inspection?
mmeeker
(Michael Meeker, CMI)
March 22, 2012, 2:08am
45
tmiller2:
Ok from left field here but if this is adopted, what does that do to 4 point inspections? They certainly will not be IAW the SOP due to the brevity of the inspection. Do they go away?
JUst found the other thread regarding this but the conclusion is not clear. Does the Fl SOP make 4 point ilegal as it does not or will not fit in the definition of an inspection?
No chance.
Anyone can pay you do do any limited inspection you want any time?
4 Point is just a name. The State has nothing to do with them. They are not Home Inspections.
They are an agreement with you the client and the insurance company.
rhensel
(Russell Hensel)
April 11, 2012, 12:56am
46
All and I mean ALL of the guideance went forth to the council and Wayne Bertch. Thanks for the input especially William and Eric, I really do appreciate it. You guys keep being the only ones giving input, then it will be your way.