# Simple Math - Right?

4 Likes

CHEATER! You weren’t supposed to Google it! I came up with 1 as the answer and found out I’d be right prior to 1917. That really dates me!

1 Like

Oh, I had seen it before. I came up with 1 on that occasion. The explanation fascinated me enough that I had saved the link.

Based on how I was taught math operations and their order using PEMDAS
Parentheses (solve equations inside first)
Exponents
Multiplication / Division

I got the answer 1 as well

1 Like

If I saved that link I would never find it again!

2 Likes

I get 9. What did you get?

I got one, then I googled it and got 9

I do not have to have the answers, I just need to know where to find the answers

2 Likes
3 Likes

First thing you do is replace the missing multiplier x.

6 / 2(1 + 2) = 6 / 2 x (1 + 2), then the rest is simple arithmetic. The obvious answer is 9.

I did the same thing quickly in my head and got 1. But I think the problem is that the equation is simple arithmetic but written as an algebraic equation. I solved the parenthesis first but then proceeded to multiply 2 to the result as if I was trying to solve for x or y.

Personally, I don’t think I confused it with pre-1917 math since I went to elementary school in the seventies.

6 Likes

It would take too much time to write down how I solved this with today’s math. This was the easy way.

9-3/(1/3)+1=?

1 Like

1 … …9-3*3+1=

I come up with 1.

I came up with 3

How did you do that?

1 divided by 3 = .333333…
9-3=6
6x.333=2
2+1=3

I don’t know if I’m right or not

9 - (3 / .3333) + 1
9 - (9) + 1 = 1

1 Like