Tennessee Licensing Requirements

Tennessee does. That’s the issue.

Perhaps you are familiar with another psychometrically evaluated test known as the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). One must take it and achieve a particular score in order to qualify for military service and, most particularly, it predicts ones success in being able to learn specific military jobs. It is generally given to high school students in their junior and senior years and is used by some high school counselors to guide kids in a vocational direction, based upon their aptitude reflected in these scores.

In the Air Force, a person who achieves a “mechanical” score of 50 is qualified to train to become a jet airplane mechanic.

Using their use of the NHIE as an example, the State of Tennessee would actually provide a license to repair a jet airplane to a high school senior getting the same score. This is what it means to license (or not) a person based upon this test.

I disagree and you have not addressed the rest of my questions.:shock:

Read my revised post.

So why should NACHI refuse to submit its competing test? Hmmm?

The we can all fight about what it takes to be a good HI.

I am against state licensure as much as you James but I’m tired of having the NHIE as the only accepted means of testing prior to licensure.

Time for this org to step up.

In my opinion, Mike…there is no written test that can pre-determine the success of a home inspector.

The closest, assuming that the knowledge of certain basic minimum standards is important (but not all inclusive), would be an ICC certification. It is the highest level of certification in the inspection industry and is NOT psychometrically evaluated and is open book. (Interestingly enough, many of the states that presently require the NHIE will also recognize the non-psychometrically evaluated and open book code test (ICC) in its place and allow those with ICC certification to waive the NHIE. Further proof that the NHIE is NOT being utilized in the manner for which it was designed in these states). Although it has only been “psychometrically evaluated”, it is being utilized as tool to measure advanced knowledge which even its administrators argue that it does not do.

But even this is a simple measurement of how well one knows the code book and can determine whether his observation is a reportable defect.

So many of the other meaningful skills necessary to do the job…cannot be quantified. You cannot measure one’s attention to detail in a dark crawlspace with a headlamp…his sense of smell or use of his senses of smell and sight, combined…to make a call on a particular condition.

Then there is the art…not science…of communicating his observations in a report.

No written test can determine the success of the person taking it and, in this respect, they are ALL equally worthless/valuable, determining upon your point of view.

That’s not the reason to seek acceptance of NACHI’s test.

It would be smart of NACHI to submit it’ test if no other reason than to answer it’s critics and add additional credibility to the NACHI certification.

Why is “answering the critics” about the test so important?

Our test, when proctored, already exceeds the requirements of ICC certification. An ICC test has only 50 questions to answer in two hours and is open book and is usually limited to one specific area (electrical, plumbing, etc).

NACHI will always have its critics and, much to NACHI’s loss, now filters them from the message board where they can be addressed and corrected. Dumbing down our test to an “aptitude test” like the NHIE is not the answer and will not convince a critic of our test.

James,

I’m sorry but in my mind you have failed to give any credible reason for NACHI’s avoidance of having it’s test validated for acceptance by state authorities.

It doesn’t have to be this way and one questions why this issue is allowed to remain.

You have also failed to prove that the NHIE is merely an aptitude test.

I hope Mr. Bowers can shed some light here. He is on the educational committee for the new home inspectors board here in Kansas. He is a very middle of the road guy. There are many laws about education here in Kansas, and the board must tread lightly. Having a home inspector that has done 3,000 inspections require to take the NHIE test is way out of line. The test will contain questions that will never be used on any home inspection. It is designed by ASHI to keep ASHI inspectors in business, and put the non-ASHI members out of business. ASHI has many names; I am just not sure where they are getting their money to push all of “their” rules, regulations, educational requirements, exams, etc. into play in all of these states in such a short amount of time.

On the news this evening, firefighters in one town passed a test, and the top 15 where all white. The “others” did not pass. So, the city threw it out. Now, the top 15 may be suing the city.

Taking any test only determines your apptitude. My brother-in-law has a MBA in busines; my nephew is an attorney; my sister is a certified teacher; all of them do not know how to change the oil in a lawn mower.

I took the test and yes there was some questions like David said, But with some study I feel most could pass i didn’t think it was that bad. But it has been awhile ago AND I AM OLD so i probably forgot ( what was the question again sorry i slipped off again.) I took the class 30 in it only about 6 actually got their licensee. 2 from that 6 do not inspect anymore. Makes you wonder.

BTW: The NHIE is NOT a psychometrically valid exam and InterNACHI’s entrance exam is.

Development and scoring of the NHIE adhere to psychometric standards set by relevant organizations, including the American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and National Commission for Certifying Agencies.

Using a scoring system that adheres to psychometric standards does not make it valid.

Read www.nachi.org/aboutexam.htm to learn what makes an exam valid.

					The National Home Inspector Examination is   both *valid* and *reliable*, two qualities required for legal   defensibility:   
  1. *Validity *means the examination is able to measure what it is supposed to measure.

  2. Reliability is an index of how accurately the examination measures a candidate’s skills. A test must be both valid and reliable in order for it to be considered a “high-stakes” exam for purposes of public protection.

       		As a result of these safeguards, the National Home Inspector Examination accurately assesses each candidate's competence to carry out the required duties of a home inspector. 
    

Just get er done Nick.

I’m not knocking the NACHI test but if the org won’t do what it takes for acceptance, why not?

??? Huh?

We’ve created the only psychometrically valid exam in the inspection industry. www.nachi.org/aboutexam.htm There is no other valid exam. We have the only one.

Exactly. I refer you to the comments about lawn irrigation systems, codes, pools and spas in post #1 of this thread. Thank you for pointing out that an examination that doesn’t measure what it is supposed to measure is not a valid exam. I’ve been saying it for years.

NHIE

Compliance with accepted test development standards
Complies with public protection and employment testing standards

• American Educational Research Association
• American Psychological Association
• National Council on Measurement in Education
• Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation
• National Organization for Competency Assurance

Well?

Michael, that wouldn’t make it valid either. Read your definition of validity in your own post #34, then read post #1, then ask yourself if measuring knowledge about lawn irrigation systems is “measuring what it is supposed to measure.”

Michael, you’ve demonstrated that the NHIE is not valid. Thank you.

There is only one psychometrically valid exam in the inspection industry that I know of. There may be others, but I don’t know of them.

Nick,

We can 'round and 'round all night.

But only you know why you have never had the NACHI exam evaluated by recognized authorities for the purpose of gaining acceptance in the industry and acceptance by licensing authorities.

I’m sure this has been discussed repeatedly and it is my hope that as NACHI matures it will do what is needed to gain acceptance of it’s entrance test.

That is silly. What would a member of a home inspector licensing board know about evaluating an exam? Especially ours which has so many cutting-edge built-in technologies (developed by InterNACHI). We don’t even know of any exam evaluation firms that could do it, let alone $25/meeting licensing board members.

  InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination was developed by InterNACHI over many years, measures competence in home inspectors based on the critical job components and delineated skill sets from Standards of Practice, Code of Ethics, interviews, mock inspections, surveys, observations, group discussions, and data collected from some 430,000+ exams already taken.  With the industry's most popular exams, quizzes and online education, combined with it's 255,000 page website and 450,000 post message board (both the largest in the industry), InterNACHI, the largest home inspection association in the world, collects and possesses more home inspection exam question/answer data and industry information than all other private and government entities combined.  Unlike other home inspection examinations that may use a panel of experts (if at all) to review and validate each question once, InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination exploits its ongoing access to most every expert in the field.  The questions/answers and any related performance issues stand the test of time under the industry scrutiny suffered in InterNACHI's message board, InterNACHI's open to all existing exams and quizzes, InterNACHI's online education, InterNACHI's exam prep tools, InterNACHI's expert trainers/educators, and InterNACHI's various professional committees.  In essence, everything the industry knows, every question ever asked to test that knowledge, and every right and wrong answer ever given to those questions, are forever examined to verify technical accuracy and content validity.  Other existing home inspector examinations admit that their content is based solely on one old role delineation study.  Exploitation of InterNACHI's massive data collection abilities has permitted the build up of a supplemental bank of psychometrically sound items (questions) that are rotated into the InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination pool replacing obsolete items with items of similar content and difficulty.  This is especially important in the inspection industry where the pool of items used in licensing exams is widely known and circulated.  The massive culling of this industry-wide data also provides a vast, published item reference in support of legal defensibility.  InterNACHI's exam system's built-in intelligence constantly and automatically calculates and recognizes absolutely everything from individual repeat improvement to overall industry knowledge trends. 

  InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination was developed using a blueprint based largely on InterNACHI's Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics with test methodology based primarily on Standards for Education and Psychological Testing by the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education.  InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination also relied on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Uniform Guidelines for Employee Selection Procedures, the National Commission for Certifying Agencies' Standards for Accreditation, and other applicable standards.  

The items in InterNACHI’s Online Inspector Examination are biased toward application, analysis, dynamic problem solving, and defect recognition where the exam taker demonstrates learning at a higher cognitive level by applying his/her knowledge on new material. New material includes a referenced photo or diagram or a situational/hypothetical stem question. InterNACHI’s Online Inspector Examination can be administered open book as it simulates the situations home inspectors face every day. Biasing InterNACHI’s Online Inspector Examination toward application, analysis, dynamic problem solving, and defect recognition gives the exam a high degree of validity for predicting inspector success in the field. Other existing home inspection licensing exams are based on recall. Such minimum standard exams do nothing more than test the exam takers ability to remember the correct answers and re-state facts.

 Because InterNACHI is already the largest provider and administrator of home inspection exams and quizzes, inappropriate, poorly worded, ambiguous or questionable questions and/or answers are quickly recognized and revised or removed from future versions.  In addition, new items are developed as the industry evolves.  With exception of the lightly weighted content domain *industry terms*, InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination minimizes the effects of ancillary skills (such as terminology familiarity) by using commonly used phrases including synonyms where available.  This also minimizes the effect of geographic bias so prominent in the inspection industry.

Each stem question in InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination is meaningful in and of itself.  In other words, the questions are worded so that the exam taker could predict the correct answer after merely reading the question.  For instance, *Q. Radon...  A. exposure increases one's chance of contracting lung cancer.*  would be worded as follows:  *Q. Radon exposure increases one's chance of...  A. contracting lung cancer.*  (note, this is not an actual item found on InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination).

Negatively stated questions appear on InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination only when necessary.  For instance, when technically correct, "*should not slope downward*" would be worded "*should slope upward*" on InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination.  Negative stems that include terms such as "*except for*" or "*does not include*" are avoided in InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination.

 Because use of "all of the above" and "none of the above" should not be used as distracters (incorrect answer options), InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination does not incorporate such answer options at all.  

Because very few things in professional settings are "always" or "never" true, InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination uses such terms judiciously.

 InterNACHI formally and informally validates every question and every answer choice (correct and incorrect).  Each item is validated to ensure that the knowledge and/or skill tested by the item is essential for one to pass*, *validated to assure that the keyed correct answer is in fact correct without ambiguity, and validated to ensure that the incorrect answer options are in fact incorrect, but still plausible enough to provide distraction.  Distracters (incorrect answer choices) found within InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination are not tricky or deceptive, but instead employ common errors.

As part of the psychometric analysis performed on the InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination, each question's pass/fail rate is calculated and recorded each time the question is answered so that the question difficulty is quantified over time.  Regular checks comparing the answers given by experienced, skilled inspectors with those offered by inexperienced, unskilled inspectors verify that each question contributes to testing the exam taker's competency.  Also, at the end of every exam session descriptive statistics custom to each exam taker are displayed along with a color pie chart depicting that particular exam taker's weaknesses.

Even though each item on InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination has only one correct or clearly best answer, InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination scoring system permits modest reward for next best answer choice and severe punishment for very wrong answer choice.

InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination scoring system is much more advanced than existing home inspector exams to the benefit of public safety.  Each item is validated to determine the relative importance on assessing the exam takers knowledge and skill, as is each answer to each question.  Then each is weighted accordingly.  Not only are the questions in InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination weighted, the answers are as well in the sense that an exam taker is punished severely (in terms of score) for incorrectly answering questions that indicate that he/she could cause physical harm to the public, but not greatly rewarded (in terms of score) for correctly answering such questions.  This same scoring is used for questions that test minimum competency.  Likewise, difficult questions (questions that lie outside or nearly outside the scope of a home inspection) are weighted such that the exam taker is not severely punished for answering incorrectly.  Other existing home inspector exam's questions and answers are all weighted the same in terms of scoring.  

InterNACHI's Online Inspector Examination was developed based on the American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education's Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Uniform Guidelines for Employee Selection Procedures, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

InterNACHI’s Online Inspector Examination is the only valid exam in the inspection industry (that I know of). There might be others, but I don’t of them.

Mike…can you name a national association for home inspectors that does not have its critics, when it comes its use as a “credential”?