At it’s origination, the current 1802 can trace it’s origins to a self-made affidavit that started as a shutter verification form in the early 90’s. As it changed and morphed into what we have now it was only fillable my airchitects, engineers, and CGC’s…not CBC’s or CRC’s…unilt around the mid-2000’s. The adaptation of the MSFH program brought the form to it’s knees, it needed to be simpler for people who had absolutely no knowledge of mitigation or hardenting of structure.
Currently, most educators teach the form from the outside in, so as to say they teach you “their” intepretation of the form without ever teaching you mitigation, wind load standards, building codes, or the application of these standards. The proper course to complete this form, such a course that no matter what changes they made to the form you would understand it and need no further trianing, would be an 120 hour course. Minimum!
In order for a roof covering to be NOA complaint it must adher to the requirements of the FBC…which speficially states that the roofing system must protect the structure. A leaking roofing system is not FBC or NOA compliant under any determination…
These criteria have been criticized because they presume a knowledge of intention (for example, the phrase “pretending to be”)[8]](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism#cite_note-8) Classification of behavior is observable, but intention is not and thus requires assumptions which need to be tested before they can be asserted as fact, especially considering multiple explanations could be made as to why a person exhibits these behaviors
You must have a tremendous internal conflict and turmoil every time you perform a UMVI. The OIR clearly defined what they want and is not code. Anyone unable to separate insurance from reality shouldn’t be doing insurance inspections, in my opinion.
A delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary.[1] As a pathology, it is distinct from a belief based on false or incomplete information, confabulation, dogma, illusion, or other effects of perception.
Delusions typically occur in the context of neurological or mental illness, although they are not tied to any particular disease and have been found to occur in the context of many pathological states (both physical and mental). However, they are of particular diagnostic importance in psychotic disorders including schizophrenia, paraphrenia, manic episodes of bipolar disorder, and psychotic depression.
Although non-specific concepts of madness have been around for several thousand years, the psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers was the first to define the three main criteria for a belief to be considered delusional in his 1913 book General Psychopathology.[2] These criteria are:
[ul]
[li]certainty (held with absolute conviction) [/li][li]incorrigibility (not changeable by compelling counterargument or proof to the contrary) [/li][li]impossibility or falsity of content (implausible, bizarre or patently untrue)[3][/li][/ul]
Furthermore, when a false belief involves a value judgment, it is only considered a delusion if it is so extreme that it cannot be, or never can be proven true. For example: a man claiming that he flew into the sun and flew back home. This would be considered a delusion,[4] unless he was speaking figuratively. Types[edit]
Delusions are categorized into four different groups:
[ul]
[li]Bizarre delusion: Delusions are deemed bizarre if they are clearly implausible and not understandable to same-culture peers and do not derive from ordinary life experiences.[5] An example named by the DSM-5 is a belief that someone replaced all your internal organs by someone else’s without leaving a scar. [/li][li]Non-bizarre delusion: A delusion that, though false, is at least possible, e.g., the affected person mistakenly believes that he is under constant police surveillance. [/li][li]Mood-congruent delusion: Any delusion with content consistent with either a depressive or manic state, e.g., a depressed person believes that news anchors on television highly disapprove of him, or a person in a manic state might believe she is a powerful deity. [/li][li]Mood-neutral delusion: A delusion that does not relate to the sufferer’s emotional state; for example, a belief that an extra limb is growing out of the back of one’s head is neutral to either depression or mania.[6][/li][/ul] Themes[edit]
In addition to these categories, delusions often manifest according to a consistent theme. Although delusions can have any theme, certain themes are more common. Some of the more common delusion themes are:
[ul]
[li]Delusion of control: This is a false belief that another person, group of people, or external force controls one’s general thoughts, feelings, impulses, or behavior.[6] [/li][li]Cotard delusion: This is a false belief that one does not exist or has died.[7] [/li][li]Delusional jealousy: A person with this delusion falsely believes that a spouse or lover is having an affair, with no proof to back up their claim.[6] [/li][li]Delusion of guilt or sin (or delusion of self-accusation): This is an ungrounded feeling of remorse or guilt of delusional intensity.[6] [/li][li]Delusion of mind being read: The false belief that other people can know one’s thoughts.[6] [/li][li]Delusion of thought insertion: The belief that another thinks through the mind of the person.[6] [/li][li]Delusion of reference: The person falsely believes that insignificant remarks, events, or objects in one’s environment have personal meaning or significance.[6] [/li][li]Erotomania A delusion in which someone falsely believes another person is in love with them.[6] [/li][li]Grandiose religious delusion: The belief that the affected person is a god, or chosen to act as a god.[8][9] [/li][li]Somatic delusion: A delusion whose content pertains to bodily functioning, bodily sensations, or physical appearance. Usually the false belief is that the body is somehow diseased, abnormal, or changed.[6] A specific example of this delusion is delusional parasitosis: a delusion in which one feels infested with insects, bacteria, mites, spiders, lice, fleas, worms, or other organisms. Affected individuals may also report being repeatedly bitten. In some cases, entomologists are asked to investigate cases of mysterious bites. Sometimes physical manifestations may occur including skin lesions.[10] [/li][li]Delusion of poverty: The person strongly believes that he is financially incapacitated. Although this type of delusion is less common now, it was particularly widespread in the days before state support.[11][/li][/ul]
You seem to know it all, so let’s see it. You seem to know that a court of law will disagree so you must have first hand knowledge of how it all works right???
I bet you don’t have an example do you?
I will be waiting for you to produce such court documents that prove your providing us with valid information.
I agree with Wayne. I see staining in athe attic with newly installed roofs all the time. If the buyer has a VA of FHA loan; this will be an issue. As Wayne stated, the roofer will be asked to go back and make the necessary repairs he most likely did not see from the top of the roof. Over time the local roofers picked up on this common situation and ask if a HI was conducted so they can view the results of the report prior to installation. Communication, Communication, Communication
Btw - what I just said has absolutely nothing to do with a wind mit. Stick to the questions on the form.
If you are anyone else is going to bring up a legal case to support your position, it needs to be a case that is accessible. If it is sealed, it carries no weight.
I would also like to see the case files, motions, discovery, etc.
I suspect there is much more here than is being told.
The only question on the 1802 that asks for code verification is question one.The other questions have an out and that is the word “or”.
On homes built post 1994 in the hurricane zone and post 2002 in the non hurricane zone, I have a disclaimer that it isn’t a code verification inspection as it is out of the scope of my license and I would be breaking the law.
So…your using a “disclaimer” in accordance with your inspection to clarify the report, then stating the standards and statutes that give you the very right to do so don’t apply…that is interesting :mrgreen:
