I get it, but would we not prefer to use plug and receptacle instead of terminations? A termination can happen in a number of ways other than what is pictured.
I personally take issue with the use of the word “Used”.
I see these “USED” in homes of every age, virtually every day!
I’m sure there is a more appropriate, correct term!
The two plugs at the top are labelled incorrectly. The round prong is the EGC not the neutral.
Same here. And I can easily buy them, far from obsolete.
My reports simply indicate which outlet is installed with a note to be sure to get the proper cord when buying a new appliance. I see both regularly, big box stores can provide either cord.
What would you recommend instead?
- This receptacle is an outdated model, but many are still in use today.
- Though replaced by newer designs, this receptacle is still in circulation.
Does anyone else find at least one range plug a week installed at the dryer? It is so common here anymore
Makes me curious how many 30 amp plugs are behind the range.
Why not just remove “old style, no longer used?” The top introduction says enough.
It does not need to be added to the illustration.
We can count.
And it is a false statement.
Sorta like the “prohibits” term. The NEC doesn’t prohibit anything. The local authorities do.
Sad that the graphics department cannot even copy a NEMA chart correctly.
Image updated: 240-Volt Terminations - Inspection Gallery - InterNACHI®
Hit refresh. Thanks fellas!
@rmeier2 I have a 3-wire home. Is it that simple to upgrade to a “safer 4-wire receptacle?”
The older 3 prong is not very likely to be able to be upgraded. Without conduit it could require potentially extensive wiring. With conduit it might be possible to pull a 4th conductor or use the conduit as ground.
Are you referring to a dryer receptacle? Yes a 4-wire would be safer but it would require running new circuit conductors.
Works for me.
Much thanks as always.