BTW my birthday, I always considered irrelevant, since I was a little kid I thought Mothers should be Honored on birthdays. Mother’s are the real hero’s, thank your Mother for not falling into the democrat trap of abortion.
You should buy one they are great pillows 
I did actually buy one (before all this recent stuff). Honestly, it didn’t work out for me, as much as I wanted it to. My wife has hers and likes it though, and I gave mine to my daughter, who also likes it.
1 Like
I’ve bought several of his pillows and other products, some of the pillows weren’t a good fit for me but were a good fit for others (as you have described). My experience is the higher loft (more filling) pillows are more to my liking.
1 Like
Sounds more and more like WHO is our leader.
2 Likes
WHO, NWO are all deepstate factions that want to kill us all.
Edit forgot WEF World Economic Forum. Blackrock… they all want to kill us “useless eaters”.
1 Like
boosted…
I finally had a chance to watch the video, but it only gave part of the story.
Tina Peters was charged with three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, a second conspiracy charge that includes “cause liability,” identity theft, first degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failure to comply with requirements of the Secretary of State.
- On April 16, 2021, Jessi Romero, the voting systems manager for the Secretary of State, contacted Brandi Bantz, the Mesa County elections director, to reject a request from Mesa County to allow members of the public to be present during a “trusted build” update of Mesa County election equipment. He reminded Bantz that only personnel from Dominion, the Secretary of State’s office, and county employees could be present. Romero also said the “trusted build” would be done under camera security. The first felony charge, attempting to influence a public servant, is tied to efforts to allegedly influence Romero.
- On April 23, Peters convened a meeting with Knisley, Bantz, Brown and Stephanie Wenholz, another elections manager. Someone secretly recorded that meeting on a cell phone and turned that recording over to investigators, the affidavit said. Also present: Sheronna Bishop, formerly the campaign manager for U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Silt; Douglas Frank of Ohio; and, Maurice Emmer of Aspen. Emmer was identified in the affidavit as an associate of Bishop, Frank and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell. None are employees of Mesa County. During that meeting, Frank claimed the voting equipment could be accessed remotely. Later in the discussion, Peters invited Frank to sit in on the “trusted build” scheduled for May 25-26. He declined but said he had a team that could do it. Bantz and Wenholz were then asked to leave the room. The second influence charge is for the effort to allegedly influence Wenholz.
- On May 13, Knisley sought an ID badge and county email address for Gerald Wood, telling the county’s human resources department he was a temporary hire for the elections department. Two charges, one for identity theft and the other for criminal impersonation - cause liability, are tied to efforts to allegedly impersonate Wood.
- On May 17, Knisley began the process to shut down the video surveillance of the tabulation room where the “trusted build” would take place. That same day, Wenholz was told she was being taken off the “trusted build” team. She was also told that Wood was a new administrative assistant for Brown. Wenholz, who does background checks on new employees, never met Wood, which was not standard protocol, according to the affidavit. Two days later, Wood was asked to turn in his ID badge to Knisley. He never worked for the county.
- On May 20, Bishop, using her personal credit card, booked a hotel room in Grand Junction for May 22 to May 26 for Conan James Hayes, a California surfer and apparel company owner who allegedly has been involved in activities in Arizona and Michigan relating to claims the 2020 elections were rigged.
- On May 23, records show key cards for Peters, Brown and Wood were used to enter the elections area. The affidavit said that, on that date, someone “unlawfully took a digital image of the entire Dominion hard drive for the specific purpose of analyzing the software and data” and that Peters “later publicly admitted to this act.” The “trusted build” took place on May 25 and May 26. Those present included Peters, the person identifying himself as Wood, and Brown, as well as personnel from Dominion and the Secretary of State’s office. Several individuals told the District Attorney’s investigator that the man identified as Wood was introduced to them as an administrative assistant.
- On May 26, Peters and Brown accessed the elections area past normal business hours. The affidavit said someone at that time took a second digital image of the Dominion hard drive. Hayes, who had already left, according to the affidavit, was sent a package by Peters, using county funds, on May 27.
In June, according to the affidavit, Knisley claimed Peters told her to lie to the county’s human resources department about Wood. The affidavit said that Peters told Knisley they had to protect the identify of the person who was coming in – who was not Wood – and that was why the cameras were turned off on May 17.
The official misconduct charge, a misdemeanor, states that Peters knowingly and unlawfully committed an act related to her office but one that was an unauthorized exercise of her official function or duty. The violation of duty charge, also a misdemeanor, states that Peters violated, neglected or failed to perform her duties or is guilty of corrupt conduct in the discharge of those duties.>
1 Like
Richard. Which video did you watch and what is your take away?
The free documentary that Dave keeps plugging. You must not have watched it since you don’t know who Tina Peters is.
It follows the true (but selective) story about a county clerk in Colorado that hired a computer guru to hack into voter computers and make digital copies in an attempt to prove that voter records were being erased.
I thought that the video was very compelling and offered some interesting possibilities of what could happen if someone wanted to alter outcomes in an election. It played on my sense of emotion from the beginning by painting her as a well intentioned officer of the law that is a cancer survivor and who lost her paratrooper son in a training exercise. I even felt sorry for her and her campaign manager when search warrants were executed.
The movie was narrated by a cold and impersonal talking computer. (picture HAL). They brought in programming experts to show how easy it could be to put in hidden code or Selective Code as the title implies. It plays on our distrust of AI and some advanced computer technology. I could see how it could appeal to a persons sense of injustice if your candidate lost. But it lacked any real evidence that there was any real election fraud. Just one of many theories.
1 Like
Nice synopsis! You are good at this.
And you are correct, I have not watched the video. You know me well enough to know I am a perpetual skeptic with a general distrust of the government.
Our tribal leaders fight for “their way” to vote because it serves them best. So let us look at France. Though they are a progressive country, their voting system is very conservative. This could be done here. But we can’t get past the voter ID thing.
Voters make their choices in a booth, with the curtains closed, then place their ballot in an envelope that is then put into a transparent ballot box. They must show photo identification and sign a document, next to their name, to complete the process.
The movie actually documents how Tina Peters lawfully backed up and saved her districts election results and was then subjected to lawfare by the corrupt establishment. The evidence she preserved shows indisputably that the machines were manipulted. Aside from her case, It was all caught on “cast vote records” which captures in real time what the vote (actually the ballot tally, completely different than legal vote tally) tally is. the cast vote records show that miraculously at 3AM in the morning 0biden went from losing bigly in 6 key swing states to barely winning.
Ooops, they also were caught injecting so many ballots into the system that they had to take a ton of them back out… how does a running count of cast votes go down? IT WAS MANIPULATED!
Remember the exact same people that are telling you that there is no such thing as child sex trafficking are the people telling you there was zero election fraud.
Many things play into this distrust. Here is case where mainstream media decided to report on it. Of course they made a very loose connection to Russia.
Lawfully, will probably be determined by a jury of peers and the court. Her trial starts in October. The “backup” was allegedly downloaded to a personal iPad and leaked to a conspiracy theory website, which is probably where your images originated. She is currently serving home detention for obstruction for not turning over the iPad.
I find it very interesting how the term “conspiracy theory” is now linked almost exclusively to so called right wing misinformation. Even though conspiracy theories are often the bedrock of good journalism or even investigative police work.
You see the haughty eye roll of people when they say “conspiracy theorist believe”. There is a degree of disgust in their tone. What they really want to say is “Those stupid f*kers over there”.
The reason this phenomenon occurs is two fold in my opinion.
- The left must contain/reduce the conservative idea “pathogens”
- Those who have a high level of trust in institutions tend to have a high disregard for conspiracy theories.
But the left also has a high propensity for conspiracy theories. They just do not label them as such. The Russian Collusion and the Hunter Biden laptop denial were both actual conspiracy theories promulgated by lies within the “leftist” community.
In the end, conspiracy theoriest have their place and can be both useful and destructive. I would caution anyone who spits the words “conspiracy theory” out of their mouth like a fly just flew in.
Here is an interesting article:
https://iep.utm.edu/conspiracy-theories/#SSH4bii
3 Likes
You’re right…that term is judgy. I should have said QAnon.
1 Like
Interesting phrase the term coined by the CIA directly following the JFK assassination.
Would like to critique this film Richard? It is produced by a friend of a friend of mine.
“England has had quite enough to do in Europe and Asia, without going out of her way to meddle with America. It was a physical and moral impossibility that she could be carrying on a gigantic conspiracy against us. But our masses, having only a rough general knowledge of foreign affairs, and not unnaturally somewhat exaggerating the space which we occupy in the world’s eye, do not appreciate the complications which rendered such a conspiracy impossible. They only look at the sudden right-about-face movement of the English Press and public, which is most readily accounted for on the conspiracy theory .”
Author Charles Astor Bristed, published in the New York Times, January 11th, 1863
1 Like