Flir i7 is this enough resolution?

As a side not I am incorrect about the i7 regarding MRad for Resnet standards. It was in the original Resnet draft, but they removed it.

JJ

John as far as MRad not being important…take Level II and then we can discuss that.

By chance do you find focus to be important?

JJ

Hope this helps.

I learned that from Will Decker. He helped write the INFRARED CERTIFIED course
and is an excellent teacher.

FLIR says the i7 meets the RESNET standard.

Write down all the reasons they are wrong and I will get their
techie to respond. I am open to hear all that you have to say.
I have been in touch with them already so let’s do it.

Since you have never done a home inspection, you might be
limited in what you know. I will be patient.

Does it help to know what your talking about?

I think you skipped a post there John, see post #41.

My original post was only to inform people of what Resnet had proposed in their original draft standard. It was not intended to be a bash on FLIR and definitely not Resnet or the people that drafted the standard. If any manufacturer’s camera were to miss a standard, I would point it out. I addressed my error in the matter concerning the released Resnet thermography standard in regards to the MRad specification and the i7.

You didn’t answer my question…do you feel focus is important? Camera focus, not focus on what people are saying…you usually seem to miss David’s points so we will not worry about that.

JJ

Well said!!! :wink:

What points did I miss regarding David?

Now on to the subject of focus…

What does the RESNET standard say about the i7 and it’s focus?
What defect will a home inspector miss with the i7 type of focus?
Provide proof.

Please be specific and I will address your concerns.

If RESNET sets a minimum standard, are they encouraging mediocrity?
What minimum standard would you set?

Is it wrong to say MORE is better, but the minimum standard camera will
work, for a home inspection, if you are on a budget?

Please do not avoid these simple questions. We need answers from those
with superior wisdom, if you posses it.
*

I have never taken your class, you should comp me one so I can give it a review. You never know it might be good. You can ask others that have called me from here. I always tell them the same thing, if you plan on doing strictly HIs with IR then take John’s course. If you plan on doing HIs and other services then take John’s course then Level I, then specialty IR training.

I know how focus is addressed in all levels of IR training, I was wondering how much importance you put on to it.

JJ

I will share my opinion here. I bought a low end camera and took the level 1 training. After using the camera in the field I felt that it wasn’t accurate enough for me to use on a home inspection. I felt that using a low end camera really increased my liability. For that reason I sold my camera and no longer offer IR services with a home inspection. I could not justify spending the money needed for the level of camera needed that would reduce my liability.

Hey Guys,

Thanks again for all the opinions here. I do not wish anyone to get bent out of shape or have their feelings squashed.

Keep in mind, I know a lot of you guys. A few joined iNACHI before me, many after. If you would have had this conversation and discussion 5 or 10 years ago, people would’ve thought you were crazy. I understand that IR is fairly new for home inspector type applications. I think we all get that the seasoned thermal imagers and trainers are still fairly new to the industry as well. I know that this game is changing and developing more every day.

I not going to knock John just because he’s fairly new to the industry and offers a class or IR. Same as I’m not going to get upset or take it personal because someone thinks just because I’m interested in a low end camera that I’m a low balling piece of shat.

With that said, wish everyone could be civil, get along, and be able to express there opinions w/ out a bunch of bs. Seems that always happens round here huh? It sucks cause a lot of good inspectors don’t post cause of this.

So, what I’m doing is seeing what makes sense for my business. Also seeing what equipment to get. I know some of you offer and find many uses for your camera. My business model may not be the same as yours.

Bottom line, what could I offer CONFIDENTLY with the i7 Flir? Energy audits? Moisture scans? Electrical scans? Roof scans? Or simply is this camera a POS and good for nothing?

Do I need to be RESNET certified and Level I? What service could I offer if I just took Johns class?

Thx again.

Which camera was it Greg? So you do NOT offer Thermal Imaging services anymore?

I also encourage all my students to take more training for
services beyond a normal home inspection. We agree.

Any camera that meets RESNET minimum standard will allow you
to do an energy audit according to THEIR opinion (John Snell
wrote the standard).

The RESNET standard also happens to be a threshold that works
for home inspections. Thousands of inspectors use 120x120
resolution cameras all the time.

Is MORE better? The answer is always YES.

If you have a strong background in construction, then your
learning curve will be much shorter in IR. If you are shallow,
then you can get into trouble.

Your camera is HIGHLY dependent on the environment you
are working in. You need to hear examples and teachings of
false positives, low delta T issues, and similar anomalies
that have more than one possible diagnosis (and the protocols
on how to isolate and verify the issue under the surface).

If you get into a low delta T environment, a more expensive
camera will see more issues than the low end camera. So
you have to be careful.

I have also seen inspectors with a low end camera find more
defects than someone with a very expensive camera. Why?
They knew where and how to look for the defects. So it’s
not just the camera that makes the thermographer.

I have seen inspectors who are filled with BOOK knowledge,
and have never built a house, have more problems when
looking through an IR camera. They lack the real world ability
to see with the “third eye” of their understanding. Even
though they learned all the correct answers to pass an
inspector exam, they lack the real world depth to diagnose
the issues they are looking at. Defects and side affects
can take on a lot of manifestations that you will never
read about in any books.

I have seen inspectors who have been in business for more
than 10 years back away from IR after they got their camera.
They never felt secure in what they were trying to do.

Training is a MUST. I recommend that you do not go out
and report until you have lots of field experience also.

Our course and Level I cannot fill-in the gaps to a person
who lacks electrical knowledge. (or… gaps in HVAC, plumbing,
roof systems, structure, EFIS, etc…). In fact, a good IR class
will cause an inspector to realize where they are weak.

Unless you take a building IR class your not going to hear
examples of all the various issues you run into while doing
IR construction scans. If you go into services beyond a
home inspection, you will need more training for sure. We
teach these principles in every class.

Even with all the bickering, this thread has been very educational. If I want to learn and based on what I can afford at this time, I think Johns class would be very beneficial to me. I do understand that I would start with this camera to help me in my inspections in seeing things better than just my eyes. This is a positive. As I get better and able to advertise the use of the camera within a home inspection it will only help separate me from others who have no camera and help increase business. Then in a couple of years when I have learned more than the camera will let me do I will upgrade to the T1000 that everybody will be upgrading to anyway.

I can see Davids point where people would take advantage of customers offering more than the equipment can do. You will find these people in every profession. I’m sure you have people who have $10,000 cameras and don’t have a clue how to use them correctly and still taking advantage of consumers.

I feel if I wait till I can afford the expensive camera, that will just put me that much farther behind in my goal to learn IR.

So what would you think based on my scenerio?? Crazy?

95% of all my students, and most on this forum, got started
with your same wisdom. Go for it.

Who needs training or a expensive thermal imager when you can rent a camera and do it yourself??:stuck_out_tongue:

Ok. Do not feel good about the Flir i7. Research and lack of positive comments :smiley: I think it’s not the way to go.

Has anyone out there used the i7 or currently own one? If so, what applications or services do you offer with it?

Guys what’s the minium camera that I’ll be happy with and offer a service that I can be proud of? Again, I’d like to offer energy audits, moisture scans, electrical, plumbing, roof, and HVAC scans.

Do I need a blower door?

What credentials do I need per each service?

What’s the most popular service you offer?

I use HG 3.0. Is there a thermal imaging template for HG? Or what do you recommend?

Thx,
Ray

Hope this helps.

Thx for the info John. Now I feel I’m making some progress!

So if I do not want to offer roof scans BUT everything else I mentioned, what would be the best camera you’d recommend? I can do withOUT offering roof scans if it means a less expensive or less resolution camera.

Do you recommend offering energy aduits without BPI or RESNET Certifications? If not, could I get certified in one or another? Which is better?

Would you recommend offering energy audits after completing your course only?

What blower door do you recommend?

John, I’d like to keep start up costs as least as possible BUT that does not mean I’m looking to waste my money on equipment or training that is junk or does not do the job properly.

Thx again.