This was discovered in the panel box. Owner is stating that the substance on the 2 wires is for the aluminum wiring going to the outside building. He stated that it is code because of the aluminum wiring.
Looks like a Silicone Dielectric Grease to me. It is used to protect electrical connections from corrosion by repelling water and sealing out air. It is most commonly used on car battery connections but will protect any electrical connection just the same.
Hope this helps.
Is that the main for the panel? Almost looks like they tried to insulate the connectors so there is a reduced chance of shock when the main is turned off.
What made me think of glue was the tail on the bottom 1/2 of the breaker. that is typical of the glue gun trigger being released and pulled away. Would Silicone Dielectric Grease stay like that for an extended period of time?
Whatever that is… might be approved to prevent corrosion of Aluminum Conductors, (might be required by some codes and or the manufacturer of the Panel/Breaker) when using stranded aluminum… But it needed to be applied to the conductors so it would coat them and the breaker lug. The application is wrong and does not do anything except make HIs scratch their heads and say WTH? If I had to guess someone called this out as needing the anti-corrosion applied, but was done by the homeowner or uncle Frank…not understanding the reason for it.
Yep. The screw head is not the conductive contact point. It’s where the conductor enters the terminal. They would have had to pull the conductors to apply dielectric grease or anti-oxidant where it needs to be. Somebody was just pretending to do something useful.
Looks like anti-oxidant paste. Very common and shouldnt be an issue. When it gets older it will appear crusty. Normally it goes on the wire though… looks like they just put it on the screw
It looks like antioxidant for aluminum. But it does no good where it’s at. Can you tell if there’s any around the wire at the connection point. If not that is a defect.
I couldn’t verify much due to the location and limited view. After further research and the replies in this thread I agree that the antioxidant was applied incorrectly.