The argument reminds me of the evolution naysayers who ask why there aren’t any “fronkeys (frog/donkey mix)” and that they just can’t believe that we “came from monkeys”. This and the global warming posts simply shows a gross, fundamental ignorance to what both theories are.
In the United States?
30 Years of Global Cooling Are Coming, Leading Scientist Says
FOXNews.com
From Miami to Maine, Savannah to Seattle, America is caught in an icy grip that one of the U.N.'s top global warming proponents says could mark the beginning of a mini ice age.
L
LOL. Now Larson believes the scientists. Michael, your slip is showing.
:roll::roll::roll::roll:
And now you aren’t, because the truth is coming out, and it doesn’t support your beliefs.
Not just the lack of fronkeys. There is absolutely ZERO fossil evidence of ANY transitional species. Certainly there are changes within species but absolutely no evidence of transitions from one species to another, as would be required by evolutionary “science”. Just another pseudo science to support a “non-creationist” point of view.
Global warming on the other hand has nothing to do with evolution or creation. Neither does it have anything to do with actual climate change or environmental concern. Instead its all about liberal/socialist control of yours and everyone elses lives.
By the way, you must not have been paying attention with the 1200 or so e-mails were leaked from the 5 main “global-warming” groups that confirm it’s all fake, smoke & mirrors.
Coldest winter here since the early 80’s.
Yes, Mark, you are one of the fundamentally ignorant.
Read slower. The analogy was comparing the level of ignorance, not the subject matter.
Mark admits that if we found 1200 emails from a few priests falsely interpreting the bible, that Christianity would then be proven false.
Are you really that stupid, or do you just play the fool on the message board?
I should have said… ALL 5 of the MAIN GROUPS. Not some of them. ALL of them.
But of course that wouldn’t make any difference to a believer with your level of faith.
Mark,
Best to leave him alone.
He doesn’t make much sense anyway. 
I have to say I’m pretty satisfied with those responses.
Same old kevin p.
Denying what’s right in front of him.
Try an honest argument some time.
Yup. It’s nice to ruffle some feathers again. It’s been awhile. I knew Mark couldn’t resist the “fronkey” post. :mrgreen::mrgreen:
I think we have found the fronkey. (frog/donkey mix)
Now what about that global warming thing and all those emails. Hmmm?
I think it’s pretty clear. No? Some scientists were fudging numbers. My analogy still stands. If the “main” priests of Christianity, whoever that may be, were to intentionally mis-interpret the Bible and make false claims in regards to that information, would that discredit the entire religion?
So you admit that belief in Global Warming constitutes a religion.
Wow! That’s quite an admission.
What’s more telling is that you’ve completely dodged the question.
This is about Global Warming not my religious views. Get it?
Should we continue to pursue a policy that pretends to address global warming when it has been cooling for the last ten years?