hey nick

[system]

Originally Posted By: John Bowman
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dharris wrote:

Ahh , but Nick, you stated on another post that you don't visit the blog, check it out and see what your missing.

Don't let him fool you Dan. He checks the blog out at least 15 times a day.   

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: rcooke
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dharris wrote:

Ahh , but Nick, you stated on another post that you don't visit the blog, check it out and see what your missing.

Why should he and others visit to see what those who are so jealous of NACHI say .
I have looked a few times and it looks to me to be the same few
feeding of each other .
It looks like they really are in Love with NACHI and just
wish they could be a part but are afraid to come back or join .

I and many others can see so many great things in NACHI that are not available in the Other associations .
I am not saying NACHI is perfect but they sure are better then what I have seen any where else.

Can you tell what association does more for its members or even 1/2 as much.

---

--
Roy Cooke Sr.

http://Royshomeinspection.com

[system]

Originally Posted By: mcyr
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dharris wrote:

dnice wrote: dharris wrote: Keeping with my personal policy of not calling someone derogatory names... I guess Liar is not to be considered derogatory according to your "policy". . If you read the statement in full, I stated someone that I don't know anything about. I've been around long enough and sparred with Nick a few times to know enough about Nick, not to mention what I don't know I can get additional facts with documentation at www.nonachi.blogspot.com.   

Mr. Harris;

It is unfortunate that you have to feel this way about NACHI.

Your display of words and your NACHI Bane of Home Inspections is very sickening, and displays your ignorance of the NACHI values.

If you think that NACHI is perpetually scumming the public for the program and membership requirements require, I feel sorry for you in your little world. Smell the coffee. Most people establish a business to make money and we all hope that it is done in the best interest of all people. Some cases it is not. So far in the membership with NACHI for a years time, I can not and will not bring up any negative views about the organization.
I have been in Construction for 40 years time brought up by a construction father that was never satisfied with me when I was 14 years old. I literally had to know what 25 year olds knew.
When I decided to join NACHI, it was prompted by the idiot ASHI member that inspected my daughters house that was not certified and one of those that decided one day that he was qualified to inspect homes.
He was probably one of my employees that felt new more that I did, which I did not tolerate, and fired or he quite and did me a favor. He went into business for himself as a Home Inspector. (ASHI) Whoa , this dude must be good, he paid all this money to be an Inspector. The gullible public has no clue and the ASHI member service.
Maine does not require a license and this business is free for all. Unfortunately, I want to do this when I decide to retire. I will not tolerate people doing a service that don't have a clue and addible their bullxxxx, to obtain the business qualifications. Get a real job. Inspection for me right now is just fun and educational, and like to communicated with all the members.

I am sorry, but, when I applied for NACHI certification, I past every test they threw at me. I have to say that NACHI on-line testing is about the closet to knowing what you know as far as what to inspect as you will ever get. The benefits are unreal and the forums are great until we meet with non-members.

I really feel sorry for you, and strongly believe you do not have a clue as to what is available, require, mandated, nor the spirit of being a NACHI MEMBER.

If you think that the NACHI entrance exam is a farce, you must of cheated. That is probably why I have seen these post on having a proctored exam.

Do it right and things will fall into the right perspective all by it's self.
Cheat, you are only cheating yourself. Reality will uncover the fiction over time. You can not hide from falsification of experience, it catch's up to you. Big cities will cover your realm of disguise for a while, but this only lengthens the time it will take for you to fall.

Hope you have a nice day.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: lewens
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Marcel


It must be that French heritage coming through. Those values are not taught any more and I for one am disheartened at the way the trades in general have gone because of it. You and I were brought up by the same generation and share much of the same ideals. I applaude you.


Larry

---

–
Just my usual 12.5 cents

From The Great White North Eh?
NACHI-CAN
www.aciss-brant.com
www.certifiedadulttrainingservices.com/

[system]

Originally Posted By: mcyr
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Thank you Larry.


Hope you are well and prospering.
Marcel

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: dnice
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dharris wrote:

dnice wrote: dharris wrote: Keeping with my personal policy of not calling someone derogatary names... I guess Liar is not to be considered derogatory according to your "policy". . If you read the statement in full, I stated someone that I don't know anything about. I've been around long enough and sparred with Nick a few times to know enough about Nick, not to mention what I don't know I can get additional facts with documentation at www.nonachi.blogspot.com.   

That is the beauty of the Internet. Any Jerk-Off (I have no policy against using that term) can find the "facts" to back up their claims and then feel somehow smugly justified when trying to pass them off as the truth.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: rwand
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Hey all you nay sayers. Don’t bitch unless you are a member only then can you legitimately knock something (i.e. membership in an association). Membership has its privileges.


As for those Canadians who seem to think freedom of association is something that can be dictated by the unknowing and the illiterate, you should read up on the law!

FWIW read it and weep! I can't stand people who pretend to know so much but continually pontificate how little they do know.

Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. Northwest Territories (Commissioner), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 367, 1990 CanLII 72 (S.C.C.)
Nature of the Freedom of Association

Freedom of association is the freedom to join together for the purpose of achieving common goals. It is a right that is fundamental to a free and democratic society. Le Dain J. in the Alberta Reference wrote at p. 391:

. . . the freedom to work for the establishment of an association, to belong to an association, to maintain it, and to participate in its lawful activity without penalty or reprisal is not to be taken for granted.

The right of association is vitally important in our industrialized society. As C. Wilfred Jenks remarked in Human Rights and International Labour Standards (1960), at p. 49:

In an age of interdependence and large-scale organisation, in which the individual counts for so little unless he acts in co-operation with his fellows, freedom of association has become the cornerstone of civil liberties and social and economic rights alike.

Freedom of association, like freedom of expression and freedom of religion, is an individual right. It is not a right which adheres to a group, or to the purposes or objectives of that group. As Clyde W. Summers observed in "Freedom of Association and Compulsory Unionism in Sweden and the United States" (1964), 112 U. Pa. L. Rev. 647, at p. 647:

Although commonly asserted by the organization, freedom of association is not simply a collective right vested in the organization for its benefit. Freedom of association is an individual right vested in the individual to enable him to enlarge his personal freedom. Its function is not merely to grant power to groups, but to enrich the individual's participation in the democratic process by his acting through those groups. [Emphasis added.]

Whenever people labour to earn their daily bread, the right to associate will be of tremendous significance. Wages and working conditions will always be of vital importance to an employee. It follows that for an employee the right to choose the group or association that will negotiate on his or her behalf with regard to those wages and working conditions is of fundamental importance. The association will play a very significant role in almost every aspect of the employee's life at work, acting as advisor, as spokesperson in negotiations, and as a shield against wrongful acts of the employer. If collective bargaining is to function properly, employees must have confidence in their representative. That confidence will be lost if the individual employee is unable to choose the association.

Canadian Charter of Rights Decisions Digest

SECTION 2(d)

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

Freedom of association.
> Fundamental Freedoms
> Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
> (a) freedom of conscience and religion
> (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
> (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
> (d) freedom of association.
>
> Application of Charter
> (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
>
> As the Constitution is the supreme law, and any law that is inconsistent with its provisions is of no force or effect, it is impossible to interpret legislation conferring discretion as conferring a power to infringe the Charter, unless, of course, that power is expressly conferred or necessarily implied. Such an interpretation would require this Court to declare the legislation to be of no force or effect, unless it could be justified under s. 1. Although this Court must not add anything to legislation or delete anything from it in order to make it consistent with the Charter, there is no doubt that it should also not interpret legislation that is open to more than one interpretation so as to make it inconsistent with the Charter and hence of no force or effect. Legislation conferring an imprecise discretion must therefore be interpreted as not allowing the Charter rights to be infringed. Accordingly, an adjudicator exercising delegated powers does not have the power to make an order that would result in an infringement of the Charter, and he exceeds his jurisdiction if he does so: Slaight Communications Inc. v. Davidson, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1038; Michaud v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 3; New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Social Services v. G. (J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 46; Quebec (C.D.P.D.J.) v. Montreal (City), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 665.
>
> The three elements of freedom of association are summarized, along with a crucial fourth principle, in the oft-quoted words of Sopinka J. in PIPSC: ?Upon considering the various judgments in the Alberta Reference, I have come to the view that four separate propositions concerning the coverage of the s. 2(d) guarantee of freedom of association emerge from the case: first, that s. 2(d) protects the freedom to establish, belong to and maintain an association; second, that s. 2(d) does not protect an activity solely on the ground that the activity is a foundational or essential purpose of an association; third, that s. 2(d) protects the exercise in association of the constitutional rights and freedoms of individuals; and fourth, that s. 2(d) protects the exercise in association of the lawful rights of individuals.? In addition to the four-part formulation in PIPSC, an enduring source of insight into the content of s. 2(d) is the purpose of the provision. In defining this purpose, McIntyre J. stressed, in Alberta Reference, the unique power of associations to accomplish the goals of individuals: ?While freedom of association like most other fundamental rights has no single purpose or value, at its core rests a rather simple proposition: the attainment of individual goals, through the exercise of individual rights, is generally impossible without the aid and cooperation of others.? The purpose of s. 2(d) commands a single inquiry: has the state precluded activity because of its associational nature, thereby discouraging the collective pursuit of common goals? In my view, while the four-part test for freedom of association sheds light on this concept, it does not capture the full range of activities protected by s. 2(d).

... Don't ya know? Anyone care to make an intelligent rebutal 

Raymond Wand
Alton, ON

---

--
The value of experience is not in seeing much,
but in seeing wisely. - Sir William Osler 1905

http://www.raymondwand.ca
NACHI Member
Registered Home Inspector (R.H.I.)

[system]

Originally Posted By: rcooke
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Dave Bottoms wrote:

lewens wrote: Sounds like Erol is turning into the next Dave Bottoms Sounds like Larry is turning into lil' Gilligan....AGAIN.    For those uninitiated, Larry is a bit of a running joke throughout the professional HI community up here in the great white north. He isn't aware of the joke, as he is not a part of that community. Dave  P.S. Hey Gilligan, when are you going to learn to stop enticing me to give you a bitch slappin'? I'm starting to think you actually enjoy it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee This is news to me . I have never heard that . Who do you know in the professional HI Community that is saying strange things about Larry .

It sure is not you after 7 + years you are still looking to get enough inspections to move into what you call the professional HI community .

I guess I will have done more inspections this week then you have in the last 2 months Of course this is my only job I do not make my living doing decks and Basements.

I see many posts where Larry has been helping those who have questions .
Your next post where you help some one on the NACHI site will be the first one I will have seen from you .
I think all you know what to do is to run down others and never give help .
I am sorry for you Dave You could have been an asset to the Home inspection industry but some where you have taken a wrong turn and now only seem to be destructive.
You,Bill Mullen and George Webb seem to be so afraid of NACHI you try to make others look bad .
I have so much information about your favorite group they are afraid of an audit and do not want the members to find out the truth . They spent $35,000:00 trying to beat me and they lost.
Those who tell the truth win.
They then settled out of court and paid me some of my out of pocket expenses.
You really should have taken the advice given to you last week to stop trying to make NACHI and its members look bad ,it keeps coming back to you and your fellow compatriots .

Roy Cooke sr .... RHI.... CAHPI/ONT

Dave if you do not think this is the truth why do you and your Buddies not spend some more of the OAHI members money and show the world where I am wrong and you and you buddies are correct.

Why not put up or shut up.
NACHI Always the best for its members

---

--
Roy Cooke Sr.

http://Royshomeinspection.com

[system]

Originally Posted By: dharris
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

deleted dbl post

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: dharris
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dharris wrote:

Mr. Harris; Quote: It is unfortunate that you have to feel this way about NACHI. Your display of words and your NACHI Bane of Home Inspections is very sickening, and displays your ignorance of the NACHI values. If you think that NACHI is perpetually scumming the public for the program and membership requirements require, I feel sorry for you in your little world. Smell the coffee. Most people establish a business to make money and we all hope that it is done in the best interest of all people. Some cases it is not. So far in the membership with NACHI for a years time, I can not and will not bring up any negative views about the organization. I have been in Construction for 40 years time brought up by a construction father that was never satisfied with me when I was 14 years old. I literally had to know what 25 year olds knew. When I decided to join NACHI, it was prompted by the idiot ASHI member that inspected my daughters house that was not certified and one of those that decided one day that he was qualified to inspect homes. He was probably one of my employees that felt new more that I did, which I did not tolerate, and fired or he quite and did me a favor. He went into business for himself as a Home Inspector. (ASHI) Whoa , this dude must be good, he paid all this money to be an Inspector. The gullible public has no clue and the ASHI member service. Maine does not require a license and this business is free for all. Unfortunately, I want to do this when I decide to retire. I will not tolerate people doing a service that don't have a clue and addible their bullxxxx, to obtain the business qualifications. Get a real job. Inspection for me right now is just fun and educational, and like to communicated with all the members. I am sorry, but, when I applied for NACHI certification, I past every test they threw at me. I have to say that NACHI on-line testing is about the closet to knowing what you know as far as what to inspect as you will ever get. The benefits are unreal and the forums are great until we meet with non-members. I really feel sorry for you, and strongly believe you do not have a clue as to what is available, require, mandated, nor the spirit of being a NACHI MEMBER. If you think that the NACHI entrance exam is a farce, you must of cheated. That is probably why I have seen these post on having a proctored exam. Do it right and things will fall into the right perspective all by it's self. Cheat, you are only cheating yourself. Reality will uncover the fiction over time. You can not hide from falsification of experience, it catch's up to you. Big cities will cover your realm of disguise for a while, but this only lengthens the time it will take for you to fall. Hope you have a nice day.

Sorry for the dely in replying, aftewr reading this I didn't know if I should cry, feel guilty or just write it off as another reply from a uninformed Nicky certifed inspector.  

THEN it dawned on me why should I feel guilty, I took all Nicks unproctored tests along with the proctured NHIE and passed them with flying colors, paid my NACHI member dues and was certified by Nick for a couple years untill I asked a few many questions and I guess maybe a few other infractions to get me un-nachi certified.

As far as being unethical or dishonest, I do have to admit about 43 years ago I did go thru Marcells state with my dad a long haul trucker and I had to hide on the floor when a cop went by, guess it was illegal for me to ride with him, I was only 10 Hope youl'l forgive me. I promise it won't happen again cause they took his CDL away, guess he was to old and getting lost.

The people you should be concerned about are the ones that are going to use the 1800 ASHI members that joined NACHI last year that did not have to take Nicks hard exam, " a little known secret Nick waves that diffucult requirement for members from other orgs as well as the requirment of paying dues"

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: dnice
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dharris wrote:

...As far as being unethical or dishonest, I do have to admit about 43 years ago I did go thru Marcells state with my dad a long haul trucker and I had to hide on the floor when a cop went by, guess it was illegal for me to ride with him, I was only 10  Hope youl'l forgive me. I promise it won't happen again cause they took his CDL away, guess he was to old and getting lost.

Sounds like the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: dharris
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dnice wrote:

dharris wrote: dnice wrote: dharris wrote: Keeping with my personal policy of not calling someone derogatary names... I guess Liar is not to be considered derogatory according to your "policy". . If you read the statement in full, I stated someone that I don't know anything about. I've been around long enough and sparred with Nick a few times to know enough about Nick, not to mention what I don't know I can get additional facts with documentation at www.nonachi.blogspot.com.    That is the beauty of the Internet. Any Jerk-Off (I have no policy against using that term) can find the "facts" to back up their claims and then feel somehow smugly justified when trying to pass them off as the truth.

My, oh my, some are getting pretty defensive, thinking back a couple years I believe this commet or a simular comment was made on this BB about certain certified Home inspectors that passed an online test from an org with no physical address or elected membership.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: mcyr
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Hi. guys. hope you are all doing fine.

I believe that Mr. Harris is a hopeless case and not worth going any further.
He should have been a Politician and not a Home Inspector. I would be amazed at the qualification and education background he would fabricate if it were requested, would'nt you?

No need to reply on this one Mr. Harris.
Thank you.

P. S. You need a spelling course if you want to continue flagging your expertise.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: Dave Bottoms
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: dharris
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

mcyr wrote:

  Hi. guys. hope you are all doing fine. I believe that Mr. Harris is a hopeless case and not worth going any further. He should have been a Politician and not a Home Inspector. I would be amazed at the qualification and education background he would fabricate if it were requested, would'nt you? No need to reply on this one Mr. Harris. Thank you. P. S. You need a spelling course if you want to continue flagging your expertise.

Marcel, are you not aware that as soon as Jim M becomes NACHI Pres. I'm going to be Nachos 2nd VP. The powers soon to be were amazed with my resume, the only reason I didn't make 1st VP, I was adamant that builders needed to complete 240 HI training and 100 parallel inspections with ASHI inspectors before they were NACHI certified.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: tallen
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

dharris wrote:

mcyr wrote:   Hi. guys. hope you are all doing fine. I believe that Mr. Harris is a hopeless case and not worth going any further. He should have been a Politician and not a Home Inspector. I would be amazed at the qualification and education background he would fabricate if it were requested, would'nt you? No need to reply on this one Mr. Harris. Thank you. P. S. You need a spelling course if you want to continue flagging your expertise. Marcel, are you not aware that as soon as Jim M becomes NACHI Pres. I'm going to be Nachos 2nd VP. The powers soon to be were amazed with my resume, the only reason I didn't make 1st VP, I was adamant that builders needed to complete 240 HI training and 100 parallel inspections with ASHI inspectors before they were NACHI certified.

s#!t Dan that makes me president!!!!

---

--
I have put the past behind me,
where , however, it now sits, making rude remarks.

www.whiteglovehomeinspections.net

30 Oct 2003-- 29 Nov2005

[system]

Originally Posted By: rcooke
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Dave Bottoms wrote:

rcooke wrote: Gee This is news to me . I have never heard that . Who do you know in the professional HI Community that is saying strange things about Larry. Roy Cooke Sr: Of course it's news to you. You are about as "in touch" (or is that "touched"?) as Larry. You should hear what they say about you. You are the only person in the history of Canadian Home Inspection who had to dump thousands of bucks into a Lawyer to get your RHI because you got caught cheating when you were with PACHI. You only won because of a procedural technicality, not because you were right. You know it, I know it and everyone knows it.     Here's a tip for you: Stop mentioning my name and I'll go away. Yep, it really is that easy. Dave

Too bad Dave has been trying for 8 years to become an Inspector and still trying to get his 150 inspections .

He just might be having trouble as OAHI only lets 4 move up to RHI a year .
ten years ago they received a private members bill 158 this gave them the ability to use the RHI .
They had about 100 inspectors then .
3 years ago the joined with PACHI and picked up about 60+ RHI inspectors this gave them about 160~ RHI's .
The total RHI's in OAHI at this time is 210 so in ten years they have increased about 4 more per year.
OAHI really is a secret society they try to give the members very little information .
Many Members do not know that they had a director remove $60'000:00 from the association.
Many members do not know that OAHI spent about $35,000:00 on my appeal and under oath the Directors admitted they where not following the rules and Bylaws of OAHI .
Many members do not know I launched a law suit against OAHI and they settled out of court with me and paid me to help cover my out of pocket expenses.
Many members do not know that OAHI has refused to have an audit to show how well their books are being tabulated .
Many members do not know that OAHI had two Treasures resign in recent times do to discrepancies in the books.
Many members do not know that for about 5 years running they have had directors quit because of ?????????? we have not been told the reasons.
Many members have never been told that it is the click who make most of the decisions and the BOD usually does as the click requests.
Many members have never been told that over 90% of those who joined OAHi leave in the first 3 years.
Nice try at making me look Bad Dave but under oath it showed I was correct and the Directors where the ones who did not follow the rules .
Please Dave do not stop coming here.
Every time you open your mouth the Members of OAHI find out some more truth about OAHI .

Roy Cooke sr........ RHI.... CAHPI-ON

---

--
Roy Cooke Sr.

http://Royshomeinspection.com

[system]

Originally Posted By: Dave Bottoms
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

.

---

[system]

Originally Posted By: rcooke
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Dave Bottoms wrote:

TOPIC: IF ROY COOKE SR. IS SO HAPPY WITH NACHI, THEN WHY IS HE SO OBSESSED WITH OAHI? rcooke wrote: He just might be having trouble as OAHI only lets 4 move up to RHI a year . ten years ago they received a private members bill 158 this gave them the ability to use the RHI . They had about 100 inspectors then . 3 years ago the joined with PACHI and picked up about 60+ RHI inspectors this gave them about 160~ RHI's . The total RHI's in OAHI at this time is 210 so in ten years they have increased about 4 more per year. OAHI really is a secret society they try to give the members very little information . Roy Cooke sr........ RHI.... CAHPI-ON Yet, you can't help but talk about OAHI daily. You even use OAHI's professional accreditation acronym after your name. Are you that embarrassed for admit you're a member of NACHI? Please Roy, get professional help. You obviously are madly in love with OAHI and can't get it out of your mind for even a minute. Your love obsession is starting to get scary. You've got to come to grips that you are not good enough to belong to OAHI and never will be. Let it go, Big Guy, move on. I know your heart is broken and you miss OAHI dearly, but you've passed your little online quiz and now belong to a nice U.S. association. You should try to focus on being happy with that. Best of luck, and stop trying to trash my name.  Dave P.S. Everyone knows you cheated to get certified with PACHI so you could use the backdoor to get into OAHI when the two associations amalgamated. You even admitted to me that you only joined PACHI so you could circumvent OAHI's prerequisites. You knew the merger was imminent and you chose the easy way in. Problem is, you got caught cheating and refused to re-take the exam and instead wasted thousands fighting it. In the end, you got in on a technicality, not because you were right. Everyone knows it.

Round two Dave states I cheated Wrong .
Thanks Dave for helping get the truth out to the OAHI members.

Tell me Dave did OAHI ever get the $60,000:00 back
that the Director absconded with?

I guess Dave never gives an answer is because
he does not Know much.

The only ones who cheat and I have it under oath is some of the OAHI directors admitted they did .

It really is bad when we have directors who lost did not have the courtesy to send an apology for their wrong doing.
Some directors are now trying to make me look bad when I have not lied .
Dave is also trying to spread their false information .
Dave is living proof that the rules of OAHI are not followed he is the receiver of one on a continuing basis.
So Bad when OAHI can not tell the members what is and has happened .
Why have they not had an audit to show the membership how their finances are.
Poor Dave keeps trying to change the subject and make me look bad .
He sends out incorrect information that he knows is wrong and I send out information that is given under oath .
I wonder why so many are trying to shoot the messenger what are they covering up.
If I am not allowed to use the letters after my name why not put your money where you mouth is and charge me .

I am sure OAHI would love to help you with some members money to shut me up .

I do not have to trash your name you do a great job on it all by your self .

I guess it is getting close to the time for Dave to run away and hide again .

The truth seems to bother him . Next step remove his post's.

Roy Sr ... RHI.... CAHPI-ON

---

--
Roy Cooke Sr.

http://Royshomeinspection.com

[system]

Originally Posted By: rwand
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.

---

Quote:

Of course it's news to you. You are about as "in touch" (or is that "touched"?) as Larry. You should hear what they say about you. You are the only person in the history of Canadian Home Inspection who had to dump thousands of bucks into a Lawyer to get your RHI because you got caught cheating when you were with PACHI. You only won because of a procedural technicality, not because you were right. You know it, I know it and everyone knows it. Dave

Mr. Bottoms you are an outright liar! You don't have the facts and you are taking whatever some in management in Oahi are telling you, which also makes them liars and knowingly spreading falsities on their behalf so they can try and make themselves look good! I suggest you put the hard facts on the table to support your corrupt theories. I was on the DPPC at the time and I know damn well what was going on. I guess I am a liar and a cheater too. Everthing Roy says is true and can be proven. Keep pushing the buttons as you provide the forum for the truth to come out here on the Nachi forum.

Everyone that can read this.... Mr. Cookes speaks the truth, the Appeal panel found in his favour and the lies, the breaking of the rules, and the animosities that percipitated the prosecution were helped along by those persons personal vendettas and the memberships money was used improperly to bolster their egos.

Mr. Bottoms is a well known spokesperson for Oahi the only problem is he never gets the facts right and continually has been shown to be dishonest, sends email viruses, utters threats, uses false names and also shows his inabilities to debate facts, but more than competent in telling outright lies.

So much for the abilities of the Editor of the Canadian Home Inspector Magazine CAHPI-OAHI to report the truth(s) objectively. Sure seems to have a tainted brain and tongue.

Mr. Bottoms you take the cake, you have the jaw of a mule!

Raymond Wand
Alton, ON

---

--
The value of experience is not in seeing much,
but in seeing wisely. - Sir William Osler 1905

http://www.raymondwand.ca
NACHI Member
Registered Home Inspector (R.H.I.)