Originally Posted By: rcooke
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
clawrenson wrote: |
Raymond I won't get into specific "case" or "event" details - but may I ask why do you continue to air these types of issues - and drag the name of NACHI in the line of fire by posting these matters here?
You rightfully are entitled to grieve your allegations to the appropriate association bodies, as your primary step in the process. Alternatively you could even try to address it on a person to person level. So deal with it on a fair and reasonable level, without dragging others into this unnecessarily. Once again, I choose not to address your other claims in your statements in this recent part of the thread, simply to reduce the risk of creating another round of unnecessary exchanges in words on such matters. After all these are best judged by the appropriate jurisdictions. |
Gee this sounds to me like do as I say not as I do.
Claude you are doing exactly what you ask Raymond not to do.
Unfortunately this is the only Place where we are able to get out true information to the Canadian Members.
Those who belong to Bill,s Closed CANUK forum are fed a very slanted and many times untrue information .
It is unfortunate that those who wish to correct the false information are chastised so severally
they no longer make posts on the CANUK forum .
Those who tried to continue to show where the errors are, get removed.
I can see why you not chastise the false information presented on the Canuck forum ( It is your removal if you do ).
The language Bill uses when he found giving FASLSE information is very far from professional
and he expects to be listened too when he goes on one of his tangents.
You say take your concerns to the proper people, Well that does not work .
I am no longer a member of OAHI/CAHPI because they did not and still do not answer complaints.
I have three complaints sent to the OAHI DPPC and no answers.
I know now why, they do not have a DPPC .
They had a very honest efficient DPPC committee that tried to stay arms length from the BOD as the Bylaws stated.
Unfortunately they have not been able to a proper replacement.
I highly recommend all Canadians read the CAHPI web site and see the much false information presented.
Bill stated CAHPI was paying for it and had put in $2,000,000:00.
Read the last sentence and sections (15),(17),(19), (36) and others.
--
Roy Cooke Sr.
http://Royshomeinspection.com