I defend you right to post the same image I did and your right to disagree with me. I have not asked for your opinion or images to be censored.
Yes it is the law of the land. Until that changes, get use to the idea that those who support abortion will be reminded of what there bloody, horrific ideals subject the unborn to. To call a mutilated baby, who was tortured to death by the bloodthirsty ilk you so proudly agree with, porn, is nothing short of demented and would best serve society by checking into the nearest mental hospital immediately.
Sorry, I don’t post photos of dismembered bodies, children or otherwise, that appears to be your department. 
Jim writes:
Correct. In a country that permits hospitals to incinerate the remains of a murdered fellow, unborn citizen along with other medical waste such as used syringes and band aids, authorities can’t then come out and claim it really wasn’t medical waste, it was a child that deserved protection, to the point that a picture of those remains posted in a password-protected, members-only, forum titled “Not For Everyone” that included entry warnings within a discussion about abortion, deserves action by authorities. They can’t have it both ways… and neither can we.
We can’t tell members to take their abortion arguments over to a thread about abortion in a password-protected, out-of-public-view forum, that has entry warnings, and that is titled “Not For Everyone” where members are choosing to visit… and then announce that the InterNACHI will decide for members what they should find offensive in there.
You can’t have it both ways.
You copied the same image (twice) in your post and it still remains there right now. Go look.
I bet you a wooden nickel if you would have just callen John McKenna up on the phone and said, hey would you please remove this for me it is really offensives too me, I understand that you may or may not find it offensives but I would if you asked me too. Please.
He would have taken the photo right down and respected what you asked him to do.
But James that is just not you, now is it?
If I am wrong, please forgive me.
I do not support abortion. I am a 50+ year old gentleman who has been married since I was in my late teens and never had any connection to an abortion whatsoever, furthermore I personally know no one who has ever had an abortion. Save your hatred for the pedophile priests in your church who regularly molest young children.
It was not a thread about abortion. The thread was about a lawmakers apology for shouting “Baby Killer” during debate. More about our politcal process that abortion.
The picture was of a DEAD CHILD. Isn’t that enough?
It was also a DISMEMBERED CHILD. And naked.
The picture, we all can agree, is disgusting (and the pics reamining in the quoted post should be removed, IMO).
I don’t think anyone surfs the NFE section with kids on their lap. That’s besides the point. Although a 4 year old, who can’t read, may just think they are hanging out with their father. But they sure can make out a picture.
My kids are often in the same room while I check the board and I have the opportunity to close any window if they are reading something age inapropriate. No one has that opportunity with an image.
Thank you for exposing your camillian personality. And yes I do hate the fact that Cathlic priests have been subjecting children to molestation, but thats not the topic of discussion, is it?
To us, it is murder. To others it is medical waste. Try not to twist it.
To children who, by the lack of parental guidance, see the image, perhaps
they will turn out to be pro life by the shocking photo of the murder.
I never promoted the idea of showing any 4 year old the NFE section,
where previous photos have been posted of beastiality, gay sexual images,
mocking images of Christ, …etc… This section is for adults IMHO, but
I cannot stop people who allow their children to see it. That is not my
job to censor NFE, when no laws are violated. If any laws have been
violated, it is only in your twisted attempt to slant this discussion and
we can all see it.
When informed that a 4 year old had seen the pic, not only was it not taken down, but two members defended it implying that it was somehow a “good thing” for the child to see.
Just trying to help you redirect your raging hatred to something worthwhile. 
Lack of parental guidance? A 4 year old can’t read, but they can see and understand pictures. I’m not one to shoo my kids away when they walk in a room.
The only twisting that is occurring is by you… to the citizens of America, Rowe Vs. Wade is the law, nothing more, nothing less. The Law!
Just like your mother use to say “If I want your help, I’ll slap it out of you”
Like your buddy Bush was fond of saying… “bring it on”. :roll:
Do you monitor anything your kids see or hear?
We all know the answer…
O.K. I’ll bring a step stool so you can look me in the eyes…:D.
Cool.
Now that this is a political thread that is not going NACHI’s way, it can be removed from the public domain and reposted in the NFE.
Good move, Nick.
I respect your right to state your opinion. I can state mine.
Slaves were not granted citizenship, just as the unborn, and
that too was once the law.