Go read the “thank you” that a member left for John McKenna. He had his 4 year old daughter in the room when he was scanning through posts and, without warning, she was able to view the dismembered corpse of the aborted infant that John McKenna posted. You know, Mike, the one that you defended.
The member is highly upset, as is his 4 year old daughter, unfortunately.
I suppose that this is okay with you.
Wanna talk more about ethics, you freak? Tell him to “deal with it”, okay? But tell him in person. I want to watch.
Well…I hope that none of the many critics of NACHI who have an access code have not shared it with any Texas real estate salesmen…for John McKenna’s sake. He might be proud of his collection of nude babies with their arms pulled off, but I think others might not be as accepting of them as he is.
Go read the “thank you” that a member left for John McKenna. He had his 4 year old daughter in the room when he was scanning through posts and she was able to view the dismembered corpse of the aborted infant that John McKenna posted. You know, Mike, the one that you defended.
The member is highly upset, as is his 4 year old daughter, unfortunately.
You’re off topic, geek. This thread is about you and a few other numbnuts calling me unethical, you a-hole.
You and your perverted pal publish kiddie porn and say “deal with it”. A member with a 4-year old daughter has just been damaged by it…and you want to complain that I embarassed you freaks by taking it to the open board.
I don’t blame you for wanting to hush this up. It must be extremely embarassing for you and your pal.
How many more kids do you think might run across that photo? It doesn’t bother McKenna. Does it bother you, or are you as f’d up as he is? Now that you know of the potential…the next exposure to a child can be construed as deliberate. I’d hate to be either one of you perverts when that happens.
I find the images distasteful, whether on a protected portion of the message board or not. I encourage the free speech, but believe that the images serve no purpose and should be removed.
Problem is that someone complained to Nick about the photos and he referred the individual to Jim and I.
We both believed the photos had no place on this message board. Nothing against John McKenna. It’s just that the message board can guarantee free-speech to members and still offer necessary decorum. Jim and I take a different road to try and accomplish something.
A call from Nick to John would have likely been all that was needed.
Instead, Jim and I engaged Nick. I offered some rather graphic examples of what I might choose to discuss and view in the NFE section that is not pornography, but in essence served a similar purpose to those with a certain mindset. Unfortunately, this failed to sway Nick.
Will I post what I threatened to post? No I wont.
I value this message board far too much.
So, Jim decided, after getting no where with management, to try a different tact.
To those of you who didnt bother me with PMs, thank you.
At this point, I encourage those who are offended to post it. I offered my counsel and position. I’ll not engage any more.
