Originally Posted By: rnokes This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
It is funny Nick, that I have been involved in moving the Canadian Home Inspection Industry ahead for about 20 years. Was on the first Board of CAHI, CAHPI, National Initiative. CHIBO steering committee to set standards for the National Home Inspectors Certification, with CMHC and NRCan and have never heard of this organization.
Originally Posted By: jfarsetta This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Why would the Canadian government reject an otherwise noble effort at starting another, and perhaps better, HI org. Did the Canadian government tell NACHI to take a hike?
– Joe Farsetta
Illigitimi Non Carborundum
"Dont let the bastards grind you down..."
Originally Posted By: rnokes This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
The Canadian Government would not tell anyone to “take a hike” as you say. But any associations that have tried to be involved with the National Initiative after the first requests for representation was done have all been requested to join an existing group. You see up here the government only wants to deal with one organization per province. They have been working with these representatives for several years now.
It would also be very difficult for NACHI to be part of the National Initiative since the educational requirements look like they will be college diploma level in order to be endorsed by the government.
Things are very different up here. The public usually does not endorse private training, they are more prone to accept public education in the college format. There is consistency in the training this way.
You can view all these documents on the CAHPI or CMHC website.
Originally Posted By: rcooke This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
rnokes wrote:
The Canadian Government would not tell anyone to "take a hike" as you say. But any associations that have tried to be involved with the National Initiative after the first requests for representation was done have all been requested to join an existing group. You see up here the government only wants to deal with one organization per province. They have been working with these representatives for several years now.
It would also be very difficult for NACHI to be part of the National Initiative since the educational requirements look like they will be college diploma level in order to be endorsed by the government. Quote]
Gee Ron If I thought you where correct I would not be dropping my membership in OAHI/CAHPI. The way I see it this organization is not for the members at large . They are a money making group that wants to make as much as they can from as many as they can so they can buy a building . They continue to do very little for the members and keep telling those who wish to become inspectors how well they can do just pay us for this course ,it never ends more courses more money and after a while 90~ get the message and move on after spending a huge amount of money .The president of CAHPI and a BOD of OAHI offers an Olive Branch to NACHI and when he realized he had lied and got caught he removed his post . This is the same person who " You sir, are one lieing s&& of a b&&ch. "posted this on the OAHI forum( His spelling ). I polity said
"What a poor way for the Past President of CAHPI to talk about a member " The Past pres then said I hate to call people liars, but darn it Roy, that's the way it is. %%%%%% continues to fabricate stuff to bolster his bull**** poison agenda."He then turned around and facetiously said I to was living in a lie .
We also have OAHI and their not answering mail from the membership .and them having 4 directors resign this past term one the Treasurer and we find the books do not balance and the membership can not get answers from the BOD on why there is not an internal audit to prove there is nothing wrong . These are the people and the organization that you say the government wants to run things . The future looks sort of Dark to me . The brightest light in the sky I do believe is NACHI. My opinion others are welcome to theirs . Roy Cooke sr
Originally Posted By: rcooke This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Unless you again are using Bill Pass word like you did before to get on to the OAHI Cafe then Bill must have pulled the post with the olive branch he offered.
I really do not know what goes on with you two trading pass words that you both know is wrong . How about the rest of the questions . as per usual you grab just a little to try and make the other person wrong . What about the financial report and the reason why 4 directors resigned last term.
NACHI is growing and it looks like it bothers you to see so many people joining.Success bothers some people.
Originally Posted By: rnokes This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
I was just trying to inform people of what is happening in Canada as far as association and education.
Again back to the mud throwing again. It seem a thread can not be started with that starting again
As I have always said there are problems with every association. Bashing each other does not help. If you do not want to belong to an association, fine. But quit knocking it. If you want to fix it belong and fix it.
With that
Merry Xmas and lets start a New Year without the bashing
Originally Posted By: rcooke This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Come on Ron You saw what was done by the Past President of CAHPI to Raymond and Roy . If I was to say about you what Bill Mullen said about us I expect you would have some thing to say . He comes with an olive branch and the insults us big time . It was all I could do not to send him THIRTY PIECES OF SILVER. I was dumfounded to see some thing like this happen . Dave tries to make out he is a nice guy and he is close to Bill only he tries to let on he is trying to be a nice guy when he plants the seed . he has no audience on the CAFE and the Canuck is getting fed up with his bantering.so he comes over here to try and continue with his spreading hate. I do not hate OAHI I just dislike their not following their rules and like you wish it could be fixed . when the click gets the message they have a problem then it could be great again . I wish you all the best and 7 more days I will not care .
Originally Posted By: John Bowman This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
dbottoms wrote:
My apologies for jumping in on your thread, but Roy's blatant lie involved me directly and I felt the need to correct it once again. He is obviously obsessed with the one time Bill used my password and I suspect he'll be bringing this up for years to come. I'm not going to let people get away with lying about me or anyone else. I hope you can appreciate that. Simply put, Roy is a liar and I won't put up with it.
Anyway, back to our usual programming.
Cheers,
Dave
Dave,
I really wish you would quit passing this off as "no big deal". It is a Big Deal. You violated our trust.
I completely understand and respect your concerns. However, utilizing such underlying tactics of providing a non-member access to a password protected site is inexcusable and should be treated as such.
What prompted you to act in this manner? What has it accomplished? Why did you violate our trust? What made you think that the person utilizing your password, name, etc. would only remain in the Canadian sector of the forum?
If it weren't for the fact that memberships to our fellow Canadians at this point and time are free, I for one would not hesitate to report this incident to the NACHI reviewing boards. Hopefully you are not the one providing passwords to banned members of this board. There seems to be one individual on another bb forum that's quite astute about the goings on at the NACHI "members only" section. In fact he posted word for word one of my posts. Now I'm pissed. And, what makes it worse for me is knowing that you did this purposely and feel absolutely no remorse or wrongdoing.
Originally Posted By: Bill Mullen RHI This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
John B. said: I completely understand and respect your concerns. However, utilizing such underlying tactics of providing a non-member access to a password protected site is inexcusable and should be treated as such.
John: I used Dave' s password because I could not get mine to work. As you can see, I have my own, so I have access to the password protected site if I wish to use it. I used his once, and I accept the fact that it was wrong. I see no reason why Dave should be subjected to constant derision for one indiscretion on my part.[/quote]
Originally Posted By: John Bowman This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Sounds somewhat reasonable. I can then assume that Dave has changed his password since then. Thank-you for owning up to the discretionary methods used in the past. Please, in the future if you can’t get your password to operate properly, contact our webmaster. He is more than willing to help you.
Originally Posted By: rcooke This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Bill Mullen RHI wrote:
John B. said: I completely understand and respect your concerns. However, utilizing such underlying tactics of providing a non-member access to a password protected site is inexcusable and should be treated as such.
John: I used Dave' s password because I could not get mine to work. As you can see, I have my own, so I have access to the password protected site if I wish to use it. I used his once, and I accept the fact that it was wrong. I see no reason why Dave should be subjected to constant derision for one indiscretion on my part.
[/quote]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bills words below from his post that he made under Daves name.
I guess his memory is not as good as he thinks it is .
If you look at the post above you will see he is not a member. Roy C sr.
Bill Mullen
Sarnia, Ont.
(My friend Dave Bottoms has posted this for me since I am not a member. )
Originally Posted By: rcooke This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Bill Mullen RHI wrote:
Roy:
I'm posting a reply now. Doesn't that prove I have a password?
Geez, Roy. Surely you can drop your pettiness and hate for Christmas.
Bill Mullen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bills words below from his post that he made under Daves name.
I guess his memory is not as good as he thinks it is .
If you look at the post above you will see he is not a member. Roy C sr.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Mullen
Sarnia, Ont.
(My friend Dave Bottoms has posted this for me since I am not a member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill can you tell me where I said you did not have a pass word .
I said you where not a member and the location where you lifted and used transferred one of my postings to another FURUM is in the members section . Unless I am wrong non members can not get into it with out a members pass word. You also stated that you had Dave post it for you Dave later stated he gave you his pass word and he removed the post you made under his name . Some one some where is in error and I do not think it is me .
Hate is not My system I hate no one and no mater what you say I do not hate OAHI . I just dislike their not following their rules and this is what I have said all along . I have not called any one a liar but both you and Dave have CALLED me a liar and I would appreciate if you can show me where I have done this. You and Dave have continued to run down NACHI many times calling " those NACHO"S " this was never used in jest . Poor Dave obviously can not get the audience he requires else where so he comes over to NACHI to do what he does best .
Roy Cooke sr .........NACHI Still the best .