Please offer the name of the person that you claim became a National Certificate Holder in Canada with 1 only year of experience. Either here or privately at clawrenson@stclaircollege.ca
John, your friend Jim Bushart was demeaning the NCP and I was merely providing comparison information. The CMI has promise, but only if it becomes defensible and verifiable.
The CMI applicant attests to certain things and provides certain evidence.
The MICB verifies certain things (criminal record, proof of 3 years in business).
That’s 2 parties. Are you saying that you want yet a third party to verify something else that won’t mean a hill of beans when the inspector is alone in the crawl space of an attic? If so, give us an example of what yet another party added to the mix would do? We’re open to suggestions.
We won’t get anywhere trying to see who can pee the farthest.
Let those who count decide…the consumers and those who influence consumers. It doesn’t have to be a contest. In fact, in a perfect world, different credentials should compliment each other so they can both add value.
Trying to show one is better than the other is just not productive. I said what I said in defense of challenges to the NCP, but in retrospect I should have shut up. We’re no further ahead after all those words.
Claude I have no idea where this post came from but if I had that information no way would I give it to you .
You have not shown why I or others should give you help on tje NCA.
You and others from the get go have refused to give out information and refused to answer questions.
I and others have been repeatedly called liars but no one in the NCP supplies much info and never any facts . Just their opinions and thoughts.
Still sounds like whistler to me.
Joe I am able to make up my own mind ,You or Ray can do much to influence my decisions thoughts or posts.
Not for an instance have I ever stopped supporting NACHI.
Roy, without all your huffing and puffing, the NACHI members have been able to get all the information they wanted plus some.
If you want to know more about the National Certification, you could go to the website like everyone else or you could watch the newspapers later this week. You’ll just love what they have to say about Home Inspecting in Canada.
As for Whistler, we are very proud of what came out of there. Once more, you will soon be seeing another big announcment about that certification. The PDI program did not die as you claim. It has been being tweaked in the background and will soon be ready for unveiling.
By the way, please do not give the NCA any information you might have, because everything you say is nothing but crap. Even your friends at NACHI now know exactly who you are and how you operate.
You said that it represents “what ever inspector should know”. That is the definition of a basic minimum standard. State laws are written with the same intent and objective.
Bill Can you find where I made that post .
Are you sure thats what I said or are you just ( like you frequently do take hear say information and try to make me look bad.)
Now Bill please be careful because I have never ever stopped supporting NACHI.
You have lots of post’s out their where it shows how you are still a continuing hypocrite.
I can bring up lots to show what a two faced person you are so be cool Bill .
I do stand by my statements and am not ashamed to have them brought back at any time.
I ,like not like you Bill do tend to leave all my statements for all to see.
I see you are still not following NACHI rules and have NACHI on your web site .
You have said many times since last year you would have NACHI up on your web site and you call me a liar.
Shame on you Bill.
http://www.nachi.org/code_of_ethics.htm#3 The InterNACHI member shall not engage in any act or practice that could be deemed damaging, seditious or destructive to InterNACHI, fellow InterNACHI members, InterNACHI employees, leadership or directors. Member(s) accused of acting or deemed in violation of such rules shall be reviewed by the Ethics committee for possible sanctions and/or expulsion from InterNACHI. #5 The InterNACHI member shall be truthful regarding his/her services & qualifications. Members of other associations are welcome to join InterNACHI but a requirement of membership is that InterNACHI must be given equal prominence in your marketing (brochures and websites) as other associations you belong to.
Whether that 1 year inspectors name is provided or not - is not the issue. The real issue is without the proof - it’s misleading because that exact reference is being used to diminish the NCP in the discussions posted here. Perhaps Brian’s comments regarding the “actual” experience of many National Certificate Holders perhaps helps demystify the reality of the depth of experience of those attaining National Certificate Holder status. So until one understands the “program” perhaps its best not to try to second guess, or publish false information.
Like many issues, without facts - its simply supposition. My point being that’s about making a choice; which coincidentally feeds into your comment about releasing names.
Many attempts have been made to answer quite number of questions already, both in a very professional and at time in an unprofessional manner. How many times did the questions go unanswered when it turned nasty?
It is not my duty to publish a list of names. However, the list will be published in due course by provincial regions. It’s obvious that some lists are open such as iNACHI, while others such as the NCP are screened for the time being. Once again - its all about choices.
C’est la vie! Life will still go on without all this madness.
That’s OK Roy - like Whistler - life goes on and thing change. Some just fall out of the loop. As I stated before - it’s all about choices. No -right, no wrong - just personal preferences.
Enjoy what we can, while we can, and make the best of it!
No Roy, but I’m getting a little bored with all this BS and I’m sure other members are as well. This is yesterday’s news Roy…give it a rest, you owe it to the members and to yourself.